Re: [gaia] controversy at its best

Vesna Manojlovic <> Fri, 15 September 2017 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8201332DA for <>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 07:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dLfobE8DGnkV for <>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 07:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73B6F1332CA for <>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 07:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP id srCTdForRmRxPsrCTdfjfb; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:02:35 +0200
Received: from (IDENT:28329@localhost []) by (8.14.9/8.14.9/Debian-xs4all~5) with ESMTP id v8FE2WpF015299; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:02:32 +0200
Received: from localhost (becha@localhost) by (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id v8FE2UhE015294; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:02:31 +0200
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:02:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Vesna Manojlovic <>
To: Kurtis Heimerl <>
cc: Arjuna Sathiaseelan <>, gaia <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
X-NCC-RegId: eu.zz
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPb94Pokpyxtih6QYw4HkyJ3rHxPI/CS+EJV00Soh0BysKp3XW37V6r7XjNVAyDtgqQngjdaC0StomaVywa+DXII1W1SV9IocG5Vpp/4q5KDA332zXI3 npQPvs4aQ+jHWzvjcWPMb2/qUC919XRP2iqffhsXJVc2gfRinwF5ecdiRds+RRFlcXgtcOSHWc9F+2Y0siGpI/jfcl2DSPT9yfM=
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [gaia] controversy at its best
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:02:40 -0000

(hi, i am mostly lurning here, but this got my attention..)

On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Kurtis Heimerl wrote:

> I'm personally pretty sure this is satire.

i hope you are right.

> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Arjuna Sathiaseelan <> wrote:
>       a paper thats creating a furore within the development community

i can imagine why the furore.

i find the argumentation well polished, but full of falacies, 
entitlement, patronising and morally wrong. it justifies violence and 
dispossession, destrucion of natural habitats for profit of the 
"technologically advanced" colonizers, genocides and ecocides...

i don't have enough words to describe my outrage. that this kind of 
"paper" could be published by a serious academic, in a peer-reviewed 
"journal", is making me sad.
(or can just anyone pretend to be on the editorail of such a journal?)


for the backgorund: "Wretched of the Earth", Frantz Fanon

Provides inspiration for anti-colonial movements ever since, analysing the 
role of class, race, national culture and violence in the struggle for 
freedom. In this book, the author makes clear the economic and 
psychological degradation inflicted by imperialism.


community, cooperation, commons, squirrels //
nature, anarchy, utopia, un-anthropocene // // @Ms_Multicolor