Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal

Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com> Mon, 05 June 2017 01:36 UTC

Return-Path: <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7915B127869 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 18:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RUXc6aQlyRwC for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 18:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78D35124234 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 18:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u10so68476981uaf.1 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 18:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=3pmu+EUXSSCVzJ0D71fsf/b22PRzXkIeEYb8AnDyIAE=; b=dIntwuAeVI494LhbnZD7YHUaVL/gW+NvyPI47+5WXecAMGg+jEx6c2fEcKd8gW9Ote 4L8WD9C5bWLqlwulth3EnRP41GhAfC/p3NjrCWaK3UOCxigxxeziz5Ocz4iOgk9Ev9Gm jZGeiNckQ+shlh2+O71blDL5Z++yWpkjVgY/i/ZiPKwFmYiwxyw4fz2wcyBiXMBKdlGg 2jd5DsLHqMRrcGmgtS+iEqIVadf0sz7YPV0xeoNbz7AoymLE55QPkpfR3pG0tqGc1WX3 mwHBQ+l1wlhXn0zWV3GAD3LjAo68D3y1y0wU3t9aEx/60TulmKf2GRX7gsK50btIEsmQ V34A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=3pmu+EUXSSCVzJ0D71fsf/b22PRzXkIeEYb8AnDyIAE=; b=RA6TTnDvHHR6YGoQreRSEG8ZgnVMoT8q7n9FlGLRnwKaeAc7pv3kg8CBD6LatGyj1n 206Px0DJAnVtXF0yKnj/S3wPLCN08zSm7UCJTJ7PCe6OJEBi5JmIAJDGZCgL1DrLO0zA Hm+okolneMlO6HPoio0QjE+Sztq3QbeO9fg/TUVIpkJrwYY0oG5hTLMniiYcPaYy65eh JLAl4LwVYZfn9oAhEUu8mblnqpw2dSixPTPabYpaepXTrvff+s1Ix7lO04gksWww23jI CrWqaXWQEViNjy/Z5AhtLT7u7Eoagjbt9yaO8CtNxgZt3oMEd7HzSGA/yWNCsdojNMX2 UiMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCafYgGq67Jn8mIa9J1yvKDxyHs185IRCQW6odX4AQLJRcyZNIM veiePOAdkTXC26U50YU=
X-Received: by 10.176.16.235 with SMTP id x43mr10342945uab.15.1496626605398; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 18:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MacBook-Pro-de-admin-alejandro.local ([186.188.76.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q17sm7337102uab.7.2017.06.04.18.36.42 for <gaia@irtf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Jun 2017 18:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
To: gaia@irtf.org
References: <CAD499eKWfpdtizyecKOrBPdM3DffZdoMaiA6_LCs1Orga=A0bA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHxHgge4wYszOQkGMwzuLv4-BkJyRa7Rx1hPXad5MWYd6ov12g@mail.gmail.com> <A029E101-29F9-4AFD-8065-521B6A7CEF5F@libre.ws> <CAHxHgge62bmw2Hz8_mkxbH2YhCS67y0f0FTYWkk0NXR6bipzig@mail.gmail.com> <59A2FF0C-E84E-40BD-B4C7-0265F9760C32@libre.ws> <CAEeTejJvchjnoizLKB9zNJmNrVDLm1eKvMPa8S8V+FopiGMnEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD499eL4PPqCpuZCC3C4Pptze13mt-GaEuL_GJwrB6fXHbn5=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHxHgge+JSm+brcnH6+36HU9ADZmEQLnNzUew3aTBCxiwD0ZOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1ef137fa-9bf6-f86a-de6c-01c8ad1a62a0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 21:36:41 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHxHgge+JSm+brcnH6+36HU9ADZmEQLnNzUew3aTBCxiwD0ZOw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A3DD24B0B4EFB494094D6A1E"
Content-Language: es-ES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/zxSU4acqotev_-Nl0s3gNqfPuwY>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 01:36:49 -0000

Hello,

  In my small and personal experience the people who ask for shutting
down networks don't mind (not even a little) the economical impact (hard
to believe & sad to say it but unfortunately it's the truth).

Alejandro,


El 4/6/17 a las 10:56 a.m., Vint Cerf escribió:
> one answer is to try to quantify the economic (and reputational?)
> impact of shutdown so that leaders who choose to adopt this action
> have a better appreciation of the costs.
>
> v
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com
> <mailto:corinnecath@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Great discussion! And I agree with much of what has been said. But
>     that still leaves us with the open question of what the response
>     of AFRINIC should be to shutdowns. I agree this proposal was
>     problematic (as I point out in the blog), but am interested to
>     hear what advocacy, support, and solidarity by AFRINIC
>     could/should look like in the case of Internet shutdowns.
>
>     Best, 
>
>     On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Jon Crowcroft
>     <jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk <mailto:jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk>>
>     wrote:
>
>         /
>         /
>         the problem with witholding a resource as a lever to try to
>         reduce censorship 
>         (witholding of access to the net) is that its 
>         a) an implicitly negative message to counter a negative message, 
>         which takes the risk of accusations of hypocrisy
>         b) it risks collective punishment 
>         i.e. hurts victims of governments' misguided policy,  
>         as well as government agency, which is over-reach
>         c) the proposal is the opposite of basic internet philosophy,
>         as per Gilmore :
>         /"The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it."/
>         which means that the proposal risks undermining citizen/peer
>         actions 
>
>         intentions are good, but advocacy, support, solidarity seems
>         like a better road
>         /
>         /
>
>         On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Nicolas Pace <nico@libre.ws
>         <mailto:nico@libre.ws>> wrote:
>
>             Thanks Vint for sharing your point of view.
>             If I may give my two cents, through advocacy is that, in
>             the summit here in nayrobi the community all together
>             wrote the proposal.
>
>             There needs to be stronger efforts to make internet less
>             country-dependant and more resilient... But these are
>             urgent matters. While we get to that resilient future, we
>             need to support our communities on their decisions
>             regarding their own problematics.
>
>             I understand that IP address may seem to be a technical
>             thing, but governments are hijacking them into a political
>             standpoint.
>
>             Instead of making this a specific action, I would suggest
>             that we could work out a regulation that requires IP
>             tenants not to shutdown connectivity as a condition to
>             receive their ranges... Or some sort of agreement on openness.
>
>             Could it be possible, and would it be useful to tackle
>             this issue? What do you think?
>
>
>             On June 3, 2017 4:41:04 PM GMT+03:00, Vint Cerf
>             <vint@google.com <mailto:vint@google.com>> wrote:
>
>                 I implied it: advocacy 
>
>                 v
>
>
>                 On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Nicolas Pace
>                 <nico@libre.ws <mailto:nico@libre.ws>> wrote:
>
>                     What would be your approach on this matter then?
>                     I'm curious to know
>
>
>                     On June 3, 2017 4:36:36 PM GMT+03:00, Vint Cerf
>                     <vint@google.com <mailto:vint@google.com>> wrote:
>
>                         My reaction: politicizing IP address
>                         allocation is a mistake and could have
>                         enormous, negative consequences including a
>                         wide range of fragmentation and legal
>                         intimidation of the RIRs.  Advocacy is fine
>                         but withholding IP addresses for political
>                         reasons is not wise.
>
>                         v
>
>
>                         On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Corinne Cath
>                         <corinnecath@gmail.com
>                         <mailto:corinnecath@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>                             Dear all,
>
>                             CFR invited me to write a blog about the
>                             recent AFRINIC proposal to deny IP
>                             addresses to governments mandating
>                             Internet shutdowns. Might be of interest. 
>
>                             https://www.cfr.org/article/should-technical-actors-play-political-role-internet-age
>                             <https://www.cfr.org/article/should-technical-actors-play-political-role-internet-age>
>
>                             Best, 
>
>                             -- 
>                             Corinne J.N. Cath
>                             Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute
>                             & Alan Turing Institute
>
>                             Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath
>                             <http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath>
>                             Email: ccath@turing.ac.uk
>                             <mailto:ccath@turing.ac.uk> &
>                             corinnecath@gmail.com
>                             <mailto:corinnecath@gmail.com>
>                             Twitter: @C_Cath
>
>                             _______________________________________________
>                             gaia mailing list
>                             gaia@irtf.org <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
>                             https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>                             <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>
>
>
>
>
>                         -- 
>                         New postal address:
>                         Google
>                         1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor
>                         Reston, VA 20190
>
>
>
>
>                 -- 
>                 New postal address:
>                 Google
>                 1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor
>                 Reston, VA 20190
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             gaia mailing list
>             gaia@irtf.org <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
>             https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>             <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>
>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Corinne J.N. Cath
>     Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute & Alan Turing Institute
>
>     Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath
>     <http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath>
>     Email: ccath@turing.ac.uk <mailto:ccath@turing.ac.uk> &
>     corinnecath@gmail.com <mailto:corinnecath@gmail.com>
>     Twitter: @C_Cath
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> New postal address:
> Google
> 1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor
> Reston, VA 20190
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing list
> gaia@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia