IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01

Bill Fenner <fenner@fenron.com> Mon, 29 August 2016 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <fenner@fenron.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1635F12D74E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fenron.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WwgL-j2U5mSO for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com (mail-yw0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EAD612D0B9 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id z8so510398ywa.1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fenron.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=HHzy2zcViy+6WuGTf5Ut3chIOfu63R/VnppMYbrh0QE=; b=hYs4RDBPDpHJPzuO/u2RDURcVnUtXOomgOl7ilU5MgkisMahZgDghksqi/jl0IFZeY y+UbvGXr4z90r+3pLYfuCVLJeHWApS90uaghjSrkCW85i/UAJcX/R5DNAvwyOA2kjx5C 4JzxSUhWEWNUD61UCQ+N/GqeSSUbb4A8o9AdI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=HHzy2zcViy+6WuGTf5Ut3chIOfu63R/VnppMYbrh0QE=; b=fdOrdoKVaf3IRsHcr0IGV5CS4JNnv4zViJEGf/5lc7KBuF52mpUPO4SYY+FeJegoZu Q/rAL/sYskASsw0NWOjez3d3KETcFzAw+Qq7eMO5JCIS05OjdwBfB/9QYX42KbtOBZQ5 ZeIxToax7cHiguiqq3kWfgc9erwoan5UkNmFmXslOdqrBuiNS+UZ74LRv4FQ20QsICl/ gtY3EEzIrAg5ic663awFm9bzCb5mw1O+8kNfxO4E3PLokILAlBSaLJqajzERe4j6Qq08 euyUxu0/L9y85x1b9Nqe8qzIW+kCa6305eLqr0pyCPkY2BM48YNrYlJJU+TPTfWl1yMZ MAZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPbsSkKtdztcVY1KnbPYoVR4CdjtMA1lfbj5JvkM6HAqIvX02eCipHm34h6DIbF3g==
X-Received: by 10.129.165.71 with SMTP id c68mr194163ywh.48.1472507156383; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.11.163.244] (216-53-168-055.subnet.mpinet.net. [216.53.168.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i84sm17372284ywi.7.2016.08.29.14.45.55 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@fenron.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G36)
In-Reply-To: <90ba9146-5aeb-9471-e855-c9a57f329ec1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:45:54 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9604F2C5-3A0F-40F4-85EF-E714D87357F1@fenron.com>
References: <90ba9146-5aeb-9471-e855-c9a57f329ec1@gmail.com>
To: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/-WA7NshsxIz9gFbrLZHV8aVNB2c>
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 21:45:59 -0000

On Aug 29, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01
> Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
> Review Date: 8/29/2016
> IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-24
> IESG Telechat date: 2016-09-01
> 
> Summary: Ready with nits. Note. I did not run these MIBs through
>  any verification tools.
> 
> Major issues: None.
> 
> Minor issues:
> * The document does not pass IDnits. The only complaint of IDnits that
>  I am concerned of is:
>  "** The document seems to lack an Introduction section."
> 
>  Anyway, if Motivation section is considered equivalent to
>  Introduction section then I am fine and the IDnits complaints
>  can be neglected all together.

That was my intention.

> * Other MIB modules than IPV6-TC has in each their DESCRIPTIONs
>  text saying by what it was obsoleted. Unless I am missing something
>  here (that justifies the absence of disclaimers) I would like to see
>  similar text in each IPV6-TC DESCRIPTION as well.

I overlooked that RFC2579 actually requires the same thing for textual conventions as RFC2578 requires for object revisions. Thanks for catching this.


  Bill

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email