Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Tue, 21 April 2015 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806CE1B2EC7 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4FF67lCupeq for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com (mail-ig0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C653D1B2EBF for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igblo3 with SMTP id lo3so99994667igb.1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=A9Ew3r9abS3MaUILCWhgg6tjE3l1fl+MACrn84BpI6g=; b=WYOwrxJe/NTaSJDK9Ue3eUmnnFRsj78avmWI5aWlAZsiVHdW3sQBx0nUHIl1+LScjb aVyU7swfLzRtd+KDmeb93owy4wYMu0PyH/boaCzxgK4fpLs6joJqS9k+VbHchwD8KmFs yLbjl8889sjcT71y0Wb+ft8Pta8YA4AgKYykyJPgYahTmhxRA4LdI+WeIAtLnDWdG3HC O2MF2ZjLzj2Dcts1MGi8nTdzR509Zs5+b5+5hNMBFRQg3ihJTqR2Is8ww4FxKAEoRPrS uLlVE+HspohEWgjubY395faP6Dt0nsMYV7LnGamVOnehc0FdA1XTIaU7PK1Xt8AaCLht 7abw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkabTx0OJAcuFGuY+I2ungGghTgtxgmotEJRfur79SdnKE/v8QJtsE7EZ+BsVMYuycGc5Do
X-Received: by 10.107.46.39 with SMTP id i39mr24673917ioo.8.1429659855158; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q11sm2234873igr.3.2015.04.21.16.44.13 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5536E0CD.7010005@andyet.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:44:13 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis@ietf.org, precis@ietf.org
References: <5536B130.7000707@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5536B130.7000707@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/-eRnLGFvx7_o5X6nEfIlh2a4Z0w>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:44:17 -0000

On 4/21/15 2:21 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review Date: 21Apr2015
> IETF LC End Date: 28Apr2015
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled
>
> Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard with one minor nit
>
> This is a very easy to read document for such a detail-rich protocol.

Thanks.

> Nit:
>
> The introduction calls out email addresses as an example of the kinds of
> strings these methods are not intended for use in preparing (along with
> LDAP distinguished names). But in the body of the document, email
> addresses (or strings that look just like them) are discussed as valid
> examples of usernames.

Long answer:

At some point, we modified the definition of the UsernameCaseMapped and 
UsernameCasePreserved profiles so that they could be used directly in 
HTTP authentication (see Section 2.1 of 
draft-ietf-httpauth-basicauth-update) and thus so that we could avoid 
having multiple profiles for username-like identifiers. That 
necessitated adding the '@' character to the username profiles, but we 
never updated the text in the introduction to reflect that fact.

Short answer:

s/email addresses//

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/