IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 25 January 2012 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95ECE21F85E7 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:57:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.736
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.736 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.137, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ywRBs-NRK7HQ for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:57:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0123121F85DB for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:57:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leavealone.cisco.com (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E37F240058; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:07:26 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4F2050A3.2070808@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:57:39 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnUz-k3=WKhRedc0MPr0EoGz+NWBKNi=qGh0RdoK6tG2Kw@mail.gmail.com> <CADBvc9-m1em1=3i78B+VKUc96VK3jMwzHZpuT2WcFUCysv2Shg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU2NoLLRkMNo8+CaOWL_f=oE2T4i-uZdG5utJvCY9+WjA@mail.gmail.com> <4F16EFCA.2000808@stpeter.im> <CABkgnnXPv0xF8E4Xo-XZe82G8y76Vx9SK+_9VNDzghSJSvdcsg@mail.gmail.com> <4F1DF332.1080901@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4F1DF332.1080901@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>, draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:57:42 -0000

On 1/23/12 4:54 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 1/23/12 4:52 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> -02 is a marked improvement over the version I reviewed.  All my
>> concerns were addressed.
>>
>> --Martin
>>
>> On Jan 18, 2012 8:14 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter@stpeter.im
>> <mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Martin, here is my perspective...
>>>
>>> On 12/17/11 ?:46 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>>>> "It is easy" is not an especially good reason.
>>>
>>> Martin, is there *harm* in completing these registrations via
>>> informational RFCs?
>>
>> I don't find that reason any more compelling. How about: "this is the
>> one we chose and there isn't a good reason to choose either, so this
>> will do"? Which is probably what you meant anyhow...
> 
> How about: "everyone else was doing it that way so the author didn't see
> a good reason to buck the trend"?

In any case, I see no reason to hold up publication of this I-D given
(1) that we have two other I-Ds taking the same path and (2) you said:

"-02 is a marked improvement over the version I reviewed.  All my
concerns were addressed."

I'm going to ask Russ to clear his DISCUSS.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email