Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-12

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 22 February 2018 04:48 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65001243FE; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:48:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=YQwa0LZJ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=mNGrdXZk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1KCDKH6wv1MV; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:48:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43127120721; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:48:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0FC21080; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:48:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:48:15 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=zfsAov3qgTdu21JkqvrcwDIoo764b UZBI5v2XK9tB2o=; b=YQwa0LZJ40S3RyRZtxvD0Tg0D43Cj+xnn8CLE/of58lfO erYoDrnDjykPv4knzkS6ZmKDV28bxM7kitgMOWv3p+ZicHRf4i3MvnPRlvXOeHOM Rysja30bI1SkwNx3R2lehXQ6CGx9fXux44/tCOBNgXQZbur6ZvcuEU1AZ6LMNJjW bBSTVQzEtvV6NyFHuUm97r8nBxy1rJsT4AqoQxg1kAURsYLmxOtHihe1WOXjx6rS TzVVFyBFPWzrFHQyerHCTyah3UD2VWcXlZ6SHNexvHtHMTskib7ZmEGv04GzRwRt z8C5VHJDBPX2QnthOUUjMwWUFeeh2ld9XBjVDe1mA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=zfsAov 3qgTdu21JkqvrcwDIoo764bUZBI5v2XK9tB2o=; b=mNGrdXZkn8oQ9eL6v8dVR8 usi3vQvvJzi1PzpdspTjZg7YHZHe7E9sdYCRjL3QqomCBOkIdiQNcZ4QY7xsGvLV sfxeB0+sRjcpQSVUXvASkzZjWrjmIGgui990nYUBKpnUuBT4Ov0/1Dj1k1Hpfl/f /Rytdw+eYPYLlV+qPxQJeQQ4RhPRgEc5NHvDaT7uw/Bc7nsOqBjeD2aoC44DL1hb 3epl5LOqvlFbna3qMzoE5L9aqqe5xpViUiCc122x8gfH5u4tdrFJFfliQu1Z8VPX CgHwPLsBi9zYrUBFDscHYkwFQO6mVcdoRp9dxYABlcpJTJkeMkFxon4WNYCs2edQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:j0uOWgSMzZmzzuRE4_vZFBFVN0lYM0lmNiFErAW28_8tPM5-DYCcUg>
Received: from [10.19.234.245] (unknown [128.107.241.191]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9BC7F24108; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:48:14 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <151906676688.18747.13363004666809682306@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:48:14 -0800
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>, bier@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1CEA3E4D-A365-4813-BE0F-42A39AF801DF@cooperw.in>
References: <151906676688.18747.13363004666809682306@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/-wWImyqTjRCGvAaWBvKNnMm50Co>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-12
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 04:48:18 -0000

Robert, thanks for your review. It appears that your concerns have been addressed in -20 (thanks, authors!). I have entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Feb 19, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review result: Almost Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-12
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review Date: 2018-02-19
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-02-22
> IESG Telechat date: 2018-02-22
> 
> Summary: Almost ready for publication as a standards track RFC
> 
> Major issue:
> The security considerations section is essentially empty (what it currently
> says reduces to "don't let malformed packets crash your implementation". Surely
> there's more to say here. Is there an assumption that, in any given deployment,
> the administrators of the bier layer and the ospf layer are the same people,
> and have the same authority? If so, it's probably worth saying so. If not, are
> there edges to discuss? If this document really doesn't introduce any new
> security considerations, it should argue why that's the case.
> 
> Minor issues:
> Is there a reason not to use the example/documentation IPV4 address ranges?
> (See the shepherd writeup). The author count is above the current
> RFC-Editor/IESG recommendations. Work that out with your ADs.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art