Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19

Alissa Cooper <> Tue, 04 December 2018 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69109130EE4; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 13:31:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.b=uVALS98b; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.b=vGcOGrhn
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id knwLLOPk9mca; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 13:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21A3E130EAA; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 13:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal []) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70E521C82; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:31:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:31:13 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=5 iBoRC2Y3Q9QaXY15XVFokePxPMgqL6u72ykEDKTZsk=; b=uVALS98bSwNKtsF0k WS/h3plJEzc9Y+sLvIThascsFjAG53+XmLUfdmKhK0RbpSnHnlIJg14Aqy+EhlzV MBsX/X21CbybWWCCa9ITc/BbgYYD3oaHowk/UpR/M/lhyt/H3i7GtWAcmw/4vdLU Pad2d6CRA8U17chu1/gMeIYx6g1GefHV8zkM+2jWMFUfn9AHigIkhW+7B7fglyVs aRDxqkWsIBwGkdR+H/qXWAJI56EshH+VyUPkg4GcPlkGcTNwES69MWQNZmG7TI8W xrc86afDuiKg21b+oZ9cyDENgkBtAQFsp9fvk9DqvgU2J+ibbo7ZUaN8Z9AXFLlN /U5EA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=5iBoRC2Y3Q9QaXY15XVFokePxPMgqL6u72ykEDKTZ sk=; b=vGcOGrhn5K1d7zHQ0IIlksAwh5UK9g/I02zZyDIto1PQSrc+znfGoCaox odtqeOfhvCbStrgpJIiK9Q2EA9iz5NxTj63oVkZOs2H9Mcnxe/HowhCMwnI0UCBy VFnT7eFokIHkTZg4eOVFsk6Xts5vF5R5MKxlVRP6fu3fE8fJ5BdKI0rrDEstuH2v YvW5c0H6bQyhFgkn5f8QXZvNjHTd9p/6ZTfvnQ1MVubF/iMXY/9V2slE5y4VR0p3 E34ikD+pp22Q4cbjExRORIAD9pEOY0MVgF93JNlAPPdJoFiBc8dX18F0WTtr/E93 QKId0Mu1C+r1WqyuguFWr6G/ZiKQQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:IPIGXKxzjUAsAdHSkH9n2qCT-Bo2VkOhYlkkMHUN56AyKctlSZjL4w>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:IPIGXCm-rBSNy_4IqqUCJ7j3BMkmMoV-xXG2Ue3DCjxYCDJeSy0LEw> <xmx:IPIGXATv--U3DbvG87CeENQvcdRFuz3Lx-FJfBCGDhI4m19eHx-SuQ> <xmx:IPIGXOIQwd6llvy94FcacarI6mo_mvNgYA86loBVbqCnajxNDcOnsw> <xmx:IPIGXO9JcVhCMsAS4gdJg6lawsxISlaAtHrh45skxHzGseZ_-i3r4Q> <xmx:IPIGXADmzniD_UBvnRinvnjbuXSS7fwRobZoSK2ay5bqIxV838cEVg> <xmx:IfIGXJnGAaruiXJudi7qZNLktCeMrmeOtStgod7pY-G8dOp2-8iakQ>
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3FD11E469F; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:31:12 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:31:09 -0500
Cc: Acee Lindem <>,, General Area Review Team <>,
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <> <>
To: Pete Resnick <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 21:31:19 -0000

Pete, thanks for your review. Acee and Peter, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot. I can see Pete’s concern but I’m hopeful that given the existing deployment experience and the added clarification in the -20 the concern will be mitigated in practice.


> On Dec 3, 2018, at 5:33 PM, Pete Resnick <> wrote:
> Hi Acee,
> On 3 Dec 2018, at 15:46, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>> Hi Pete,
>> While both you and I would have done it differently, the variable length SID encoding across the three LSR protocols (OSPFv2, OSPFv3, and IS-IS) has been implemented, deployed, and will not be changed during the IESG review (you'll note these SR protocol drafts have been in development for over 5 years). There is, however, an update to all three which clarifies the usage of the flags. See (for example):
>> Thanks,
>> Acee (Document Shepherd and LSR Co-chair)
> Totally understood, and that's why I said that I certainly don't want to stand in the way of the doc. And I appreciate the clarification in -20; it helps. My job as a GenART reviewer is to make sure that the Gen AD is aware of any issues. I think it's highly unlikely that she (or anyone on the IESG) would balk at this point in history.
> Thanks for your (and Peter's) quick replies to these reviews.
> pr
> -- 
> Pete Resnick
> All connections to the world are tenuous at best
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list