Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-trill-clear-correct-04

[Meral Shirazipour <[e-mail]>]

Hi Donald,
    Thanks a lot. All good with me.

Best Regards,
Meral

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donald Eastlake [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: July-05-12 09:50
> To: Meral Shirazipour
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-trill-clear-correct-04
> 
> Hi Meral,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Meral Shirazipour
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-
> ART, please see the FAQ at <
> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> >
> > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
> posting a new version of the draft.
> >
> > Document: draft-ietf-trill-clear-correct-04
> > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> > Review Date: 2012-07-03
> > IETF LC End Date: 2012-06-20
> > IESG Telechat date: 2012-07-05
> >
> > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I
> have some last editorial comments.
> >
> > Major issues:
> > -none
> >
> > Minor issues:
> > -none
> >
> > Nits/editorial comments:
> > -Consistency with RFC6325, [Page 18], below the table, "end station
> service disable bit" --missing dash--> "end-station service disable bit"
> 
> OK.
> 
> > -Consistency: Acronyms are usually spelled out, then followed by the
> acronym in parenthesis [when first used]. On few occasions this has been
> reversed, ex. check for:
> > "EISS (Enhanced Internal Sublayer Service)", "DRB (Designated RBridge)" vs
> "Reverse Path Forwarding Check (RPFC)"
> 
> OK. I think acronym followed by spelling out in parenthesis is probably best
> for uniform format.
> 
> > -Informative References, Ref. [802], please if you get a chance verify
> > again the date of this document :) I checked again on the version freely
> available at http://standards.ieee.org/about/get/802/802.html, it says "7
> February, 2002". I could not find anything dated "8 March, 2002".
> 
> IEEE 802 distributes a CD of all of its standards to all of its active members (I
> believe to all the voting members of all of its working
> groups) each year in November. (Actually, they are physically handed out at
> the November 802 plenary meeting but if you qualify you can pick it up at a
> later meeting if you don't attend the November meeting or forget to pick it
> up there.) Under separate cover, I will send to you the pdf for IEEE Std 802-
> 2001 from the CD that was distributed to me in November 2011. It says 8
> March 2002 on the title page (and "Approved 6 December 2001" on the next
> page).
> 
> Thanks,
> Donald
> =============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   [phone] (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA  [e-mail]
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Meral
> >
> > ---
> > Meral Shirazipour
> > Ericsson
> > Research
> > www.ericsson.com