[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-09

Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 17 February 2023 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B335C1524DB; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:29:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.10.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <167666577029.20422.12640724701716495865@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:29:30 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/0m71H4iu4H8umCpI0OOVrmAJljE>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 20:29:30 -0000

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-09
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2023-02-17
IETF LC End Date: 2023-02-23
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: After addressing an issue, this will be ready for publication as a
Proposed Standard RFC

Issue: draft-ietf-add-dnr needs to be a normative reference, or some other
mechanic needs to be used to ensure draft-ietf-add-dnr is published as an RFC
before IANA follows the instructions in this document.

Nit: The discussion in paragraph 3 of section 3 and the note that follows are
currently ambiguous. When it calls out that 2865 limits the size of DHCP
options and that 7499 and 7930 relaxes the limit, is it only trying to inform
where the recommendation of supporting 65535 bytes came from? Or is it trying
to constrain the size of any DHCP option added to the the attributes defined
here to 4096?