IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10

"Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com> Fri, 12 January 2018 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E3E127010; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:12:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ez4xK6-9s4Kr; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:12:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B544126C19; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:12:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15950; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1515791525; x=1517001125; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=jAof+anvp61qDXcwK39epgQXjNVOHTzmyMd1p27JW2Q=; b=mO9QUibrBKOTvnBmIP+Ppt8d0sgOTXgNE2JHnGzU5/m3gw+Uu4Ka1BV+ LQSNG+PrL/299Q79r2kxoQveUKX8m2/+zw0sSaHx5G3ftnX0eIRy3UvEQ p5D2eVgd94RER7EFLG/J2Fqsrthvh2cc4lhrFdgYgdO36yRSHoEvFejb6 A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B1AQDFI1la/4wNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJKd2Z0JweEDYokjmCBWyeJC4hVhVGCFgolhRYCGoQnPxgBAQEBAQEBAQFrKIUjAQEBAQMjVhACAQgOAwMBAigDAgICHxEUCQgCBAENBQkQiTZMAxUQrmiCJyaHFg2CcAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2EPIIVg0ApDIJ5gmtEAQECAYIOFoJhMYI0BYpMiU6FWIk1PQKICog9hQKCGYYdi1qNPkCIegIRGQGBOwEfOYFQbxVnAYF/CYROeAGKeIEXAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.46,350,1511827200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="55408740"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Jan 2018 21:12:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (xch-rtp-001.cisco.com [64.101.220.141]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0CLC4Ma024513 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:12:04 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:12:03 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com ([64.101.220.145]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:12:03 -0500
From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Vijay Gurbani <vkg@acm.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay.all@ietf.org>
CC: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10
Thread-Index: AQHTemZaZ7TyEr44HU+11jorQWPur6NPshWAgCD6zgA=
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:12:03 +0000
Message-ID: <365AF207-54A8-4338-BE76-0E585E22E21A@cisco.com>
References: <151386581037.12921.16380046165179697315@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESsxcDO9EDOtCLOaxeP9ShAsQvs39pqzf=ao+xXsOBo6DpA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsxcDO9EDOtCLOaxeP9ShAsQvs39pqzf=ao+xXsOBo6DpA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.29.0.171205
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.128.224.235]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_365AF20754A84338BE760E585E22E21Aciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/0yDLWG7qXgDeqnGgyoesc5Qdk6g>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:12:08 -0000

As requested, added a note in the IANA section.

Cheers,
Ali

From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, December 22, 2017 at 5:34 AM
To: Vijay Gurbani <vkg@acm.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay.all@ietf.org>
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: Cisco Employee <sajassi@cisco.com>, <jdrake@juniper.net>, <nabil.bitar@nokia.com>, <rshekhar@juniper.net>, <uttaro@att.com>, <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>, <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, <db3546@att.com>, <akatlas@gmail.com>, Thomas Morin <thomas.morin@orange.com>, <thomas.morin@orange.com>
Resent-Date: Friday, December 22, 2017 at 5:34 AM

Vijay:

Hi!

Thanks for your review!

The registry has a FCFS registration policy, so at some point in the life of draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay the code points were requested — not necessarily in the draft itself.

Even though draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay is tagged in the datatracker to have replaced draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay, I think you make a good point in that the registry needs to be updated with the current/correct information.

Authors:  Please add a note in the IANA Considerations Section to have the reference in the registry point to this document.

Thanks!

Alvaro.


On December 21, 2017 at 9:16:53 AM, Vijay Gurbani (vkg@acm.org<mailto:vkg@acm.org>) wrote:
Minor issues:
In S13 (IANA Considerations), I am not sure whether this draft is allocating
the tunnel types or not. The responsible IANA registry [0] shows that the
tunnel types mentioned in this draft are already allocated through a precursor
individual draft [1], which has long expired. However, when I look at the IANA
Consideration section in [1], it is empty! So I am not sure how the IANA
registry in [0] received the allocations. I think the IANA section of this
draft needs to be updated accordingly.

[0]
https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-parameters/bgp-parameters.xhtml#tunnel-types
[1] http://www.iana.org/go/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay (the expired individual
draft itself is at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email