IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Mon, 18 June 2018 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2EC130DF9; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=vVb34F5z; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=HYKzxNwL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N7MutOEie_Pa; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BADA812872C; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EF922050; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:44:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:44:57 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; bh=08e2jknh/BeZeAo7nin0Nu/6D4GrTjyzP+iXTflgn7Q=; b=vVb34F5z +rT96aXIAUt+t0SeTyRl7tvBymdBCo00jiGuiz7jALcxRbJ6y/iXzDOoSzm1OJeh jUj8z8OcHpboZh2dfineqLl3VZW0OP6aQBjZoorbBgYVh5HrfdsqB7403EuxXi42 Yke6Zgc7AW7WlKcbncLNFFBgMXnEL/gR+UUBgLqg5ljNvbJR5VNESUpJm5/WiArl 7ecexTSa4pqiTnUN/7wG6MFCOYv3s3VSrmrXFrRPQarTUGYPcVuczzUgUU4Sb0OE uQ7PBKR5PB6W2nPpZxOhjB4+RG0mgVmZ1nSSr3kr7P3PK7aLkM+Wz526RIPB46L5 zXLeMLC9lC5UEQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=08e2jknh/BeZeAo7nin0Nu/6D4GrT jyzP+iXTflgn7Q=; b=HYKzxNwLTAW7Rca4Jp8fPIVMsWnrVn6BuVuoKPBrVc9Rj Nq+GoAfd57+JVkP+lIGG+uWIeHxLdM1D4BBElIQY1a2M/tJtjowXGveUtNgxRUhp NsAXDZP7sNvS4cAa1biQWpwY1aHugqnssm4eEfiy79lzL3Ad8TDcBS4mGqQfCOkT TCoOZiXF7qPEY9Y2RDheFCt0biza+NclIiNOfxIIDvMvW+h2smUEl4HyApKnuquD a+cHxYfFDCfHnVooIBiyWAfu1giEQj920FCebWg3cgvClZ245tSVh5h794jkFGP/ gKjVaQlzmjiv2cCvjwwFLCetuAnrELSs1LChb0u6g==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:me8nW44lE99hCP6Y-gLW209-kN1So1QHAHaGiyN_9wLqSZhRAqGzPw> <xmx:me8nWzeJmk4uOuBSwybQpmGkX02QiovsjQ5zN_4f74kqu1esrx2wcQ> <xmx:me8nWy65VF3yH4_j7g-xrCP5R4_Q0pxFAUdrWkatFxQDpLoYDaMm2g> <xmx:me8nW71tO3UrUM54_dnUqi9w1iPxePKlRBNSPTlwV8v_FVzvk6EPmQ> <xmx:me8nW9ClIm9KpijYl7d7t7EQysr40hN50SEH78zp2sXnQleY3PgZpg> <xmx:me8nW82iI7ZWOAyHsiJ0dXY7Pd-RsfBE-kB_BP7RzzVxkobBQDhGig>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:me8nW0VzXjE6aTNn85WWZORy3qOJpyB6zU70gto-Pb2mlYgLJTgV2Q>
Received: from [172.19.249.89] (unknown [104.153.224.166]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1D25FE442C; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:44:49 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0E6BC772-F223-4DB0-BD2F-AF1B71A8C17B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU0QiNEnywWor0qzLMwunA4_XaCHOOiOnrAZt_XXadVLEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:44:41 -0400
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw.all@ietf.org, pals@ietf.org, "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <22883AA3-E923-4294-95AD-9DC1C7E37391@cooperw.in>
References: <152877425096.2652.654313340478370473@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA=duU0QiNEnywWor0qzLMwunA4_XaCHOOiOnrAZt_XXadVLEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/18jmdKp6tHzlYD3G0cIL3BNdFPw>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:45:03 -0000

Brian, thanks for your review. Andy, thanks for your response; hopefully it means Brian’s comments will be addressed? I have entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Jun 12, 2018, at 1:50 PM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Brian,
> 
> Thanks, your comments are much appreciated.
> 
> Cheers,
> Andy
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:30 PM, Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06.txt
> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> Review Date: 2018-06-12
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-15
> IESG Telechat date: 2018-06-21
> 
> Summary: Ready with nits
> --------
> 
> Comments: 
> ---------
> 
> This (with RFC4928) is a wonderful example of why layer violations are a Bad Thing.
> 
> Nits:
> -----
> 
> > 1.  Introduction
> ....
> >   This document recommends the use of the Ethernet pseudowire control
> >   word in all but exceptional circumstances.
> 
> That's wrong, it *mandates* this usage with a MUST (first paragraph of section 4).
> 
> > 3.  Background
> ....
> >   A recent posting on the Nanog email list has highlighted this
> >   problem:
> >
> >   https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-December/089395.html <https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-December/089395.html>
> 
> No, it's no longer recent. How about:
> 
>    For example, a posting on the Nanog email list highlighted this
>    problem:
> 
> > 7.  Operational Considerations
> >
> >   CW presence on the PW is controlled by the configuration and may be
> >   subject to default operational mode of not being enabled. 
> 
> That sentence is hard to parse. Try this:
> 
>    A configuration switch might determine whether the CW is used on the PW. 
>    The default configuration might be to disable use of the CW.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email