[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-05
Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 29 August 2019 14:38 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6420112083B; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-senml-etch.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <156708950337.21012.630829697167091848@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:38:23 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/1D9FZWPn0-tmoLESPYpDXj0chWI>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:38:24 -0000
Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-05 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2019-08-29 IETF LC End Date: 2019-09-02 IESG Telechat date: 2019-09-05 Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC, but with nits to consider before publication Nits: Since the string "-etch-" is in the media type, it might be nice to say in the document where it came from. I think the text in the interoperability considerations sections of the registrations could be improved. You mean to talk about unrecognized keys, not unrecognized key-value pairs. I also think the body of the RFC should have a very short extensibility section that explicitly says you're doing a similar thing as 8424 section 4.4 and point to that section. I am a little uncomfortable with the "Fragment Identification" section (4) of this document - it feels like a "do what we mean" statement. I don't have text to suggest. It may well be that it will be dead-obvious to an implementer what to do, but it makes me uneasy.
- [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-c… Robert Sparks via Datatracker
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Ari Keränen