Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25

Ines Robles <> Fri, 17 May 2019 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926CA120131; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-K2MS_BM-wJ; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B5D31200D7; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id e184so10913102ite.1; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uVDuURxaaaB54B03guxF/2xIxFI9bhdvQe7f/EMfZi4=; b=MOlQMxtP+BgffdzP9POwRgTD8Hd63aKaO7AShKbDCnzAvTDXYN2bDSX639YvennYWy dhP+K6q7kDnhI8cWZmNG3fQOOgk0mfAL86D6q9BTOzWBbnTmG3maZgr6OnnOLwTZloZF wtOu9FurPW34hjG2HMEbWBYHapMR/sg4i8THh+c0SJmQaiJ19mdaJvfFMKazuDpnleoi SSOp5CPgO2gCpuwglw6oKR/YmJYseNRmG6RCt6UVidpjIVGseVCSLlRDJ9lVkdrUBH3w qp9OL0OIrYM/kt4TU8M/+j7JGVcDV9w/icCaeQsXaFpqFHhX0YpdyO2PJ+Rb7TNoq/fE 19qg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uVDuURxaaaB54B03guxF/2xIxFI9bhdvQe7f/EMfZi4=; b=X63uzAADlJhaKvRLKrSPNwdD7eZJcdX4BNmBOnme0ZK4cmTcictIVPOSrRVo6FKtWY 6OR0m0USj0OVoRVhfj52+Z47yFcOJqobTAtUfych4HVxmmEFvlDS20C1aGjpC+ZkTIsO eu1QTK812gkNtJbIrJCYqzN+08u257Nxn6QzI0EDofsANpDq2KfETMZ4zxiM5jmWo4NF mRFKK7I5f5JxWv1vVesLswNUwSJMukXrfM808Zhu8gYl8Da4Z0e/0U7mgiSdcd2TG3fy 18siJaIW1pzirHsrfbDnwK6Z0Y1vSVhGFa8OLizbMixTWbnWHOtaMuxKEF08jBeQ4J0E HBWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUtrnCDcKi3BJPRjaZYg101nMHnFmtTa0YPkuP3vw5KTt1xS4af LtIf/dUXtIkMEG6Hks0xikDNvr+DzhVM9MIZ8+wVUSrh
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwXx9YvNTbZPkwIWIrmrHvl3cQEhBu9SoJPEeWr8DLljBxMr9SGudu0ACSmF2wd7ZiKaq10R+fPuRlXcawtAl0=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:bc02:: with SMTP id n2mr12149590ite.35.1558084865124; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Ines Robles <>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 12:20:53 +0300
Message-ID: <>
To: Russ Housley <>
Cc: IETF Gen-ART <>, roll <>, ietf <>,
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ea6f14058911e652"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 09:21:08 -0000

Hi Russ,

Thank you for your review. New version was submitted with corrections.
Please find answer in-line.

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 8:34 PM Russ Housley via Datatracker <> wrote:

> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> Minor Concerns:
> Section 1 says:
>    ... This document clarifies examples that intend to
>    illustrate the result of the normative language in RFC8200 and
>    RFC6553.  In other words, the examples are intended to be normative
>    explanation of the results of executing that language.
> This set the wrong expectation for me.  What the document seems to
> be doing is aligning with the recent normative change in RFC8200.  The
> alignment could lead to a flag day, and this document suggests a way to
> avoid a flag day.  It goes through a whole bunch of use cases to
> illustrate the updates.

New text was added to adress this:
"The ROLL WG analysized how [RFC2460] rules apply to storing and non-
storing use of RPL. The result was 24 data plane use cases. They are
exhaustively outlined here in order to be completely unambiguous. During
the processing of this document, new rules were published as [RFC8200], and
this document was updated to reflect the normative changes in that
document. "

> Nits:
> In Table 6, please move some of the whitespace on the right to the first
> column to avoid so many words being split across lines.
> Tables were fixed.

All the Best,