Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-housley-sow-author-statistics-00

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 21 September 2015 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082461A9125 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w0RnvfTUWRm0 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE021A911D for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5EEF2417D; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:29:11 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZvltnOe8q7O7; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:27:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8D4F24143; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:28:50 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <55DF86E7.7090902@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:28:39 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C1AB7577-B888-440D-9258-1DE74A05D596@vigilsec.com>
References: <55DF5F0D.9090707@nostrum.com> <55DF86E7.7090902@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/1YV2w7Urs5NCUB6HLN6t7Yu5kDw>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-housley-sow-author-statistics-00
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:29:23 -0000

Joel:

I would rather not include the specifications for another phase of work in this document.  We want to reference this document in an RFP, so it is better to keep if focused on the work at hand.  I'll try to come up with some words about possible future work.  Hopefully those words will address both of your comments.

Russ



On Aug 27, 2015, at 5:53 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-housley-sow-author-statistics-00
>      Statement of Work for Extensions to the IETF Datatracker for
>                           Author Statistics
> Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
> Review Date: 27-August-2015
> IETF LC End Date: 23-September-2015
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
> 
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC
> 
> Major issues: N/A
> 
> Minor issues:
>    There are a few references in this document to the format evolution.  It seems that either this document should provide for additional work as those changes occur, or should indicate that such further work will be dealt with separately at the appropriate time.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
>    I wonder if this document could or should identify additional metadata items that the new formats could provide to make these statistics more reliable.