[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-10
"Peter Yee" <peter@akayla.com> Wed, 13 July 2016 02:29 UTC
Return-Path: <peter@akayla.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1544F12D954; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 19:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vUNzUllGR3VV; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 19:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa08-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa08-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 888D812D93F; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 19:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spectre ([173.8.184.78]) by p3plsmtpa08-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id J2Vw1t00B1huGat012VwWV; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 19:29:57 -0700
From: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
To: draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel.all@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 19:30:00 -0700
Message-ID: <016801d1dcae$749d9680$5dd8c380$@akayla.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdHcrc3nlhceogAlQ7uvZVLfcWk0mA==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/20RT_4KSJ_gajewhnnku-KUVyvk>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 02:29:59 -0000
Seems like this draft has been sent back for another IETF LC. My review, below in the original message and follow-up, applies to draft -10. Since this is an LC review, the following blurb applies: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comment. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-10 Reviewer: Peter Yee Review Date: July 5, 2016 IETF LC End Date: July 21, 2016 IESG Telechat date: TBD Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. [Ready] -Peter -----Original Message----- From: Peter Yee [mailto:peter@akayla.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 6:10 PM To: draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel.all@ietf.org Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org Subject: RE: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09 Draft -10 has just been published and it addresses my concerns. So: Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. [Ready] -Peter -----Original Message----- From: Peter Yee [mailto:peter@akayla.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 1:07 PM To: draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel.all@ietf.org Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org Subject: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09 Reviewer: Peter Yee Review Date: July 1, 2016 IETF LC End Date: July 1, 2016 IESG Telechat date: July 7, 2016 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as a Proposed Standard, but has some nits that should be fixed before publication. [Ready with nits] This draft extends TRILL RBridge Channels so that they can transmit additional, tunneled message types. Security services for RBridge Channel messages can be provisioned via RFC 5310 authentication and/or DTLS. The draft is well-written and easy to understand in the larger TRILL context. The nits noted in the Last Call review will be addressed in a new version of the draft, as already discussed with one of the authors. This review is posted in order to make the Telechat deadline, as the date for the next draft is not known to this reviewer. The previous (Last Call) review can be found here: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg13423.html