Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-trill-oam-mib-06
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 19 August 2015 21:06 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1501B2AE2; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EGNmQARnMlNq; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155461A88A7; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B5B2CC96; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:06:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mBGbpcXr7sgc; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:06:04 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27A12CC5C; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:06:03 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CF909339-4D86-4C3E-9F89-615F3D415809"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <55D0A91C.9000900@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:06:01 +0300
Message-Id: <A3B1D5B7-05EF-45ED-887A-F62B0C8DB346@piuha.net>
References: <55CE9892.4010600@gmail.com> <D1F5713C.E1CB8%dekumar@cisco.com> <55D0A91C.9000900@gmail.com>
To: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/22DUx6j7i5xxjfj9U7yd3rHxhJQ>
Cc: "Deepak Kumar (dekumar)" <dekumar@cisco.com>, Gen Art <gen-art@ietf.org>, Tissa Senevirathne <tsenevir@gmail.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, "trill-chairs@ietf.org" <trill-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, "Samer Salam (ssalam)" <ssalam@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-trill-oam-mib-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:06:10 -0000
Tom: thank you for extensive review and, from my perspective, very valid comments. Deepak: thank you for accommodating Tom’s concerns. I have decided to ballot no-obj; please continue the discussion to determine if something additional is needed for the restart question. Jari On 16 Aug 2015, at 18:15, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote: > For an example, look at <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perrault-behave-natv2-mib/?include_text=1>. Search on the text "DiscontinuityTime". You will find several instances, relating to the different tables. A discontinuity can happen not just because of restarts, but also when a new object is configured. > > Tom > > On 16/08/2015 1:47 AM, Deepak Kumar (dekumar) wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> Thanks for detailed review. >> I have taken care of all comments except need guidance on below comment. >> >> 4) Has any thought been given to including an indication of when the >> counters were last reset (e.g, due to restart)? >> >> Please provide more details on scenario of restart. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Deepak >> >> On 8/14/15, 6:40 PM, "Tom Taylor" <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >>> >>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >>> >>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >>> you may receive. Sorry for the late review, but there was a pile of >>> reading to do in preparation. I admit I did not read the whole 1800 >>> pages of 802.1Q. >>> >>> Tom Taylor >>> >>> Document: draft-ietf-trill-oam-mib-06 >>> Reviewer: Tom Taylor >>> Review Date: 2015-08-14 >>> IETF LC End Date: 2015-08-13 >>> IESG Telechat date: 2015-08-20 >>> >>> Summary: Not quite ready. Minor issues and editorials/nits. >>> >>> Major issues: >>> >>> Minor issues: >>> >>> 1) Section 5.2 states that IEEE8021ServiceSelectorType has two values. >>> In fact, 801-1Q-2014 enumerates more than that. I'd suggest a slight >>> change in wording to reflect this: >>> >>> OLD >>> >>> IEEE8021-TC-MIB defines IEEE8021ServiceSelectorType with two values: >>> >>> - 1 representing a vlanId, and >>> >>> - 2 representing a 24 bit isid. >>> >>> NEW >>> >>> The IEEE8021-TC-MIB definition of IEEE8021ServiceSelectorType includes >>> the two values: >>> >>> - 1 representing a vlanId, and >>> >>> - 2 representing a 24 bit isid. >>> >>> 2) Section 6.2 indicates that TRILL OAM has no support for Link Trace >>> Message/Reply. Perhaps text could be added to say why this is so (i.e., >>> that Path Trace has been substituted, as indicated in Sec. 10 of RFC >>> 7455, and has been supplemented by Multi-destination Tree Verification >>> Message/Reply). >>> >>> 3) "Reference Overview" in the MIB module header indicates that the >>> TRILL MIB module refers to the original CFM document, IEEE 802.1ag-2007, >>> instead of IEEE 802.1-Q-2014. Why the older starting point? >>> >>> 4) Has any thought been given to including an indication of when the >>> counters were last reset (e.g, due to restart)? >>> >>> 5) description of trillOamMepTxPtmStatus refers to the MEP Initiator >>> State Machine. Reference should include pointer to the description of >>> this state machine. Where is it defined? -- not in RFC 7455. Similar >>> comment regarding the description of trillOamMepTxMtvmStatus. >>> >>> 6) Description of trillOamMepTxPtmMessages: there is no indication in >>> RFC 7455 of how this limit is used. More text is needed here. Does >>> number of hops affect the count of transmitted messages against this >>> limit? Similar comment regarding the description of >>> trillOamMepTxMtvmMessages. >>> >>> 7) Surely this document has normative dependencies on 802.1Q and the >>> LLDP-MIB, for which no reference is given, BTW. >>> >>> >>> Nits/editorial comments: >>> >>> 1) Under "Abbreviations" in the MIB module header, definition of SNMP >>> Agent, need to spell out NE. Similarly, spell out EMS and NMS in the >>> next definition. >>> >>> 2) Description of trillOamMepTable: s/rowsare/rows are/ >>> >>> 3) in the descriptions of trillOamMepPtrFlag and >>> trillOamMepPtrErrorCode, incorrect section numbers for RFC 7455 are >>> given in the references. Should be 8.4.3? >>> >>> 4) Description of trillOamMepPtrIngress: s/PTM/PTR/. Similar comment for >>> trillOamMepPtrEgress. >>> >>> 5) Syntax error for trillOamMepPtrIngressPortIdSubtype: syntax should be >>> LldpPortIdSubtype. Descriptions of trillOamMepPtrIngressPortIdSubtype >>> and trillOamMepPtrIngressPortId should be interchanged. Similar comments >>> for trillOamMepPtrEgressPortIdSubtype and trillOamMepPtrEgressPortId. >>> Note that syntax is also stated in the Entry definition and has to be >>> fixed there, too. >>> >>> 6) Same problem as 5) for the corresponding trillOamMtvrTable objects. >>> >>> 7) Security Considerations, third para, first-to-second lines: >>> s/MAC-ACCESS/MAX-ACCESS/ >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-trill-oa… Tom Taylor
- [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-trill-oa… Tom Taylor
- Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-tril… Deepak Kumar (dekumar)
- Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-tril… Tom Taylor
- Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-tril… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-tril… Deepak Kumar (dekumar)
- Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-tril… Tom Taylor