Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016-01

Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> Wed, 06 July 2016 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <pal@sandflow.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F2A12D583 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 17:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandflow-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T3IsT1EL-nTe for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 17:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8445A12D567 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 17:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id l125so75662422ywb.2 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandflow-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XFOe7angBCFN+d8c7zWLDX/JE1ll6TeZJHbsVSYhOBE=; b=IvHtGvq6RGhS91MYGPNbKRK24B74BDZg3+mJwqKfX7af209RWagf3ScfB/WEtLVUK5 0ZqF6tQ/CC6zdpWNk/dBX9G8I+7P5tQI3K/leJfvme28ixRjln3MFTyV8d6t/mTNYOws 4S/A0NrimyKzuHQiZ/kKZW+4G3dktZ6bBws/zuQU+g0/OePtY+PqR5Bbze6OYHkzrDQ6 egzMc+DcOGbfL8KVKaeI+Zvrls5YfBjjHO082Qbc8n16d3fINuyWd678ZkGvfR/hb/ZV z+dDXp1GQ0791ipDMpjW4GwAIx6yN/5J5JYzELGBs15hz2OYRX40M+S285f32uWf6/E+ J4+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XFOe7angBCFN+d8c7zWLDX/JE1ll6TeZJHbsVSYhOBE=; b=LGcyY8wsVJq1Im+ydbdATaEG8Wtf+W+66Z5Moy6WjGtUKUUWiOlsdhB2XhhHh53Nbg m+lPtix+Hs3pWaPy58vohuodnmzH5KG0MysoyJpHe1y2BGgAGv6iT7PLFIhvcqFxQJAF 1p53LpKK5T+xVgLx8pZ4xModaBzkT29ABAA7656IwtKvUJHQs35adpFB40RcsFv3YqKA 4q2DvnjyOWOmmBdmb9o8WOKi9c2Eo/X5E2s6YVm2WbEO+baCxIH7GDwjMB0sS8JcWoGL Ac2LmdFnYIrWSZPNLeqckftv37e9zPUwQ4+KjHlyrFcNZo2lm1tnONEMGklEi6E7rezJ YQig==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIObNbsc0cog8R1+8GpsUOdhGg0CmjXlCB1F+CIWrWl01+gHt5qbGM9OGAsifiymA==
X-Received: by 10.13.194.3 with SMTP id e3mr9395336ywd.50.1467765932872; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f181.google.com (mail-yw0-f181.google.com. [209.85.161.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b20sm8102692ywh.10.2016.07.05.17.45.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-f181.google.com with SMTP id b72so76125844ywa.3; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.129.41.11 with SMTP id p11mr12942351ywp.37.1467765931756; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.253.65 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 17:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAF_7JxDG9dGYOuTgrkHEERRmgHBenznfebjjOGnJgUbnAThhRg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5cfe1036-0ce0-8c52-6dc9-77cec5b3f1c0@bell-labs.com> <CAF_7JxCLzzcDxL_Bu0o0azDAOirUshBvD-Y_wfi8V2c1LgsTcw@mail.gmail.com> <b5a08bf7-74be-5cbb-6f31-a3c748350fa1@bell-labs.com> <CAF_7JxDG9dGYOuTgrkHEERRmgHBenznfebjjOGnJgUbnAThhRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 17:45:12 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAF_7JxC5aHaAo53-Q6=ThzF7WZYS-K98uuyh+h6O48bZKw=XVA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAF_7JxC5aHaAo53-Q6=ThzF7WZYS-K98uuyh+h6O48bZKw=XVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/2Ku_26jnZdg-i5sk-EZJ3s0TTUw>
Cc: draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016.authors@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016.ad@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 00:45:35 -0000

Hi Vijay,

A revised I-D that adds a note under "Rules for Lexical Equivalence"
is available at [1].

[1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016-02.txt

Best,

-- Pierre

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
<pal@sandflow.com> wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
>> I will appreciate if the "including 'urn:eidr:'" part made it into the draft.
>
> Ok.
>
> BTW, should I plan on creating a new I-D before the scheduled
> telechat, or after?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Pierre
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani <vkg@bell-labs.com> wrote:
>> Pierre: Thank you for attending to my comment.  More inline.
>>
>> On 07/02/2016 03:30 PM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Vijay,
>>>
>>> I appreciate the review and comment.
>>>
>>>> That is, are the schemes (urn, eidr) part of the case-insensitive string
>>>> match?
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, it looks like
>>>
>>> "Lexical equivalence of EIDR-URN is defined by case-insensitive string
>>> match."
>>>
>>> should say
>>>
>>> "Lexical equivalence of URN-EIDR is defined by case-insensitive string
>>> match."
>>>
>>> This would confirm that the entire URN-EIDR string defined in
>>> "Declaration of syntactic structure" is considered for matching,
>>> including "urn:eidr:".
>>
>>
>> I will appreciate if the "including 'urn:eidr:'" part made it into the
>> draft.  Implementers have varying level understanding as they attempt
>> to divine RFC text.  So to the extent that we can make our intent
>> explicit with a few additional strokes of the pen (or the keyboard), we
>> are all the more better off for it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> - vijay
>> --
>> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Nokia Networks
>> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
>> Email: vkg@bell-labs.com / vijay.gurbani@nokia-bell-labs.com
>>
>> Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq