[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric-10

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Mon, 30 November 2015 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292A61ACE83 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:17:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fcsZ94HdQcTj for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:17:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFA911ACE78 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:17:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net ([]) by resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id nsGh1r00829Cfhx01sH9ZK; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:17:09 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([]) by resomta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id nsH81r00Z3KdFy101sH9iC; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:17:09 +0000
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
To: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric.all@ietf.org
References: <56211EB8.6060403@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <565C7684.1020806@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:17:08 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56211EB8.6060403@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1448900229; bh=GbB9ai8Egoll8m+wulrjk1RLDdUHWz2pJecBzARtkzo=; h=Received:Received:From:Subject:To:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=Bi0o9KfgQ7Bt3ZTLHT+HTe6IGejfYdodzF6Ua9hSoYRe5b//hZ2V0sUUFUxacmWkG AGrpUxV1RP4Y4KkVhRKKSp8I/mJ1Zakab8leP+KKCWKEcgmgsbzwlFnorUdRUzt9RS ZvcDfPTuaOWuFvd04si7X4r4VsRsEQ9jeBWHohaRI3OeZ4eiXbqRAt1d7O7hZeR5CN jT4JPR7Nm8iwVzgt3f3Xcm0v/ResCtWsA6sE68PEzbeSMdU3CATegWvVReD/E2Y8A1 FnM/5aFY5G+vw8EJn/OGxW0u68GxNuZfAT4bdE+8tHpMyesgg1KFTt88ZjQzIM/IAT OL/ti1ldgdVbw==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/3WZ0YC-mjghH6bPbqM7X5A5hjWg>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:17:11 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document
shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more
information, please see the FAQ at <​ 

Document: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric-10
Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
Review Date: 2015-12-03
IETF LC End Date: 2015-11-23
IESG Telechat date: 2015-12-03

Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as an 
Experimental RFC, but has nits that should be fixed before publication.

Major Issues: NONE

Minor Issues: NONE

Nits: 1

IdNits reports a few issues. Most of them are bogus, only one has any 
validity. It notes that there is no IANA Considerations section. This 
document has no requirements for IANA to do anything, but in that case 
it should have an IANA Considerations section that says that, as 
specified in bullet 7.D of section 2.2 of