Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness-07

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 01 December 2016 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44C5129C47; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:35:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wGBOT64C_HO2; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:35:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110BE129CE9; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D922CCAE; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:30:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id roDjLowWtYZa; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:30:30 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3BE2CC95; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:30:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F1D9C40F-8D2B-4C6A-A7C6-C5C13FEC51D5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <20161201025912.GQ8460@kduck.kaduk.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:30:29 +0200
Message-Id: <484BE147-BB9C-4302-9CA1-1BF23B1AE04C@piuha.net>
References: <EE7359A5-ACD3-4CD1-B1B0-E01579203FFE@gmail.com> <0AD0BB5E-1539-4C38-99A4-B40AD4E9D9A1@vigilsec.com> <CY1PR03MB23155A8C6BEE7C1E24F5DCF1D08A0@CY1PR03MB2315.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <BLUPR03MB145845F42132DFA15862A79FCD8A0@BLUPR03MB1458.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <20161201025912.GQ8460@kduck.kaduk.org>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/3f9lWSHh2YHL2r7Kai14PfswtyE>
Cc: "Paul Miller (NT)" <paumil@microsoft.com>, Michiko Short <michikos@microsoft.com>, IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:35:18 -0000

Many thanks for your review, Russ, and for thinking about this space and what issues there might be.

I too am concerned about the issue that Russ Housley raised: bad practices in creating the freshness tokens creates a security issue. If this cannot be handled in the way that Russ initially suggested (setting a minimum number of bits) then a proper discussion of the issue and recommendations to avoid the problems need to be included in the security considerations section.

I fully recognise the point from the authors that different styles of creating the tokens result in different implications, and that setting a mere minimum number of bits may not be appropriate.

Jari