IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03 (was: RE: Assignments for the 2016-06-30 Telechat)

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 29 June 2016 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B76212D158 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id biIGgMDB_X-Z for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5918A12DAEE for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922712CCB0; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 01:12:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g9Uhy0KZw6C7; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 01:12:34 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D703F2CC64; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 01:12:33 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_893F8446-0E51-43BD-81B8-D229E744E5D1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA7521F55A@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 01:12:31 +0300
Message-Id: <F1337E4F-82E3-4276-A5CB-9206D3EFA2A7@piuha.net>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA7521F4FD@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <4836E2F225D043954399B5FB@cyrus.local> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA7521F55A@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/3m_yYsYcXJArcy36joaduMbRoEc>
Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-calext-extensions.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-calext-extensions.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03 (was: RE: Assignments for the 2016-06-30 Telechat)
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 22:13:02 -0000

Thanks, all!

Jari

On 29 Jun 2016, at 17:07, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:

> Perfect timing. My only pending issue is addressed. From the Gen-ART point pf view this document is Ready.
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cyrus Daboo [mailto:cyrus@daboo.name]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 5:04 PM
>> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review Team
>> Cc: draft-ietf-calext-extensions.all@tools.ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03 (was: RE: [Gen-art] Assignments
>> for the 2016-06-30 Telechat)
>> 
>> Hi Dan,
>> 
>> --On June 29, 2016 at 1:44:03 PM +0000 "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)"
>> <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> There was no update to this document since my previous review. My
>>> original review raised two issues - one was clarified by explanations
>>> from Alexey (thanks!); the other is about the document status (should
>>> it be marked as 'Updates RFC 5545'?). I did not see that addressed. It
>>> would be nice to get an answer, but I do not believe this is a show-stopper.
>> 
>> A new -04 version of the draft has just been published with your review
>> issues addressed.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Cyrus Daboo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email