Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-06.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 05 December 2012 11:35 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016C921F8977 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 03:35:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PY+Nw9xUngp6 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 03:35:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595A521F896F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 03:35:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hj13so1318482wib.13 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:35:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NAa9HIzc/MHwGLe2aiGzqscaW8tDV54RTMLY2LE5G5I=; b=HwazKCg/w7qCWlaWU4DQgJUa0CX568sJN+hyOu7q31uV0DqdpBapK+1OWHSt2T8l4r wRc379Qp9jHt2xIo8u1epo5pPzE9gQlsqRU9T6eqWaiokBgipUpbiSlwRRFvGIJKjAHs RiJ3UxGkbga1Z/1ziN4/MskuZBJxMompuzOq1GMAE29YNGhc4l2FLNQEg0Wj4HFsieVl epVGiiUdYq/dXn+ZRGeVmTLT5h51zSM2DwjQbGpl0sj9TeUn/YOse380h/adodGCq5eM twitcoSKjshRP06x6VJl8glczYW0g5wcMLxOhXYbS7WPdifyCHE9trPAwjnCq/XugIoA t9rg==
Received: by 10.180.86.167 with SMTP id q7mr2609894wiz.21.1354707346587; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:35:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-102-216-76.as13285.net. [2.102.216.76]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d9sm19285295wiw.0.2012.12.05.03.35.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50BF3199.4000109@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:35:53 +0000
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kevin Fleming <kevin@kpfleming.us>
References: <50BF242F.8000709@gmail.com> <CAE+Udoqd_GHaEF6h_HGVZP8AwkKMaVGygKc5sJjcr8X=SsTiKA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE+Udoqd_GHaEF6h_HGVZP8AwkKMaVGygKc5sJjcr8X=SsTiKA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-06.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:35:48 -0000

On 05/12/2012 11:01, Kevin Fleming wrote:
> The language in RFC 3840 doesn't appear to contemplate the situation you've
> proposed. In its world, registrars can either support prefs (and will
> accept "Require: pref") or they don't, and they don't have knowledge of
> which feature tags are registered with IANA and which are not. Of course,
> they *coud* attempt to validate the tags expressed by the UA, but I don't
> see an explicit way for the registrar to indicate that the UA included
> disallowed tags in its request.

Understood, but in that case I don't see what good the confirmation
of the tag from the registrar to the UA achieves - the UA is not going
to be able to do anything with it (except maybe log whether it was
received).

    Brian