IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Sat, 16 January 2016 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33AC1B3479; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:43:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g4wpbxUlueSu; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:43:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 032511B3478; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A2C1C0D95; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:43:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=1.tigertech; t=1452905006; bh=kwD4gg4/Wv2E8dXScpG9YcnFSbwiJ0hijdK6vdoQd7g=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lW0Ibf+fLNusv/90HBXW39ZYfnlatO3+IgI2RoTO4wt8GGJUXAKynoxhdbFEA/EH2 fvO2rxCb8Zuk7G+SbBkVv/uKN5iTRx8uacFqdUYMvXT1KGll1Wj2hJxfxXJTHseuzj mbLyixXBYODR8B/WB5XU5GNsnSy4boPusK+nNyZQ=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEE7F1C038B; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:43:25 -0800 (PST)
To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>, Ralph Giles <giles@thaumas.net>
References: <569820FC.7050309@nostrum.com> <56997225.9000405@joelhalpern.com> <569983AB.9020704@thaumas.net> <56998526.2020508@joelhalpern.com> <5699862E.7040001@xiph.org>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <569991F6.1070004@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:42:30 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5699862E.7040001@xiph.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/3xZ5sBZdpadUEZvOxVrGMfEKU_Y>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-codec-oggopus.all@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 00:43:28 -0000

That would work very well.  Thanks Tim.
Yours,
Joel

On 1/15/16 6:52 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:
> Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>> On the minor note, I had not realized those were already relevant
>> parameters.  Anyone using this can reasonably be expected to know that,
>> so it is not a big deal.  Given that it would only take one sentence, it
>> might be nice to add the statement anyway.
>
> We can certainly add text to point out that this is a limitation of RFC
> 6716, e.g., "The duration of an Opus packet as defined in RFC 6716 can
> be any multiple..."
>
> For 48 kHz, we might say, "It is possible to run an Opus decoder at
> other sampling rates, but all of them evenly divide 48 kHz. Therefore,
> the value in the granule position field always counts samples assuming a
> 48 kHz decoding rate..."
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email