Re: [Gen-art] [lamps] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-18
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sun, 15 May 2022 23:13 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E960C2AFFF5; Sun, 15 May 2022 16:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ur_EHaIV0hUg; Sun, 15 May 2022 16:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50941C2740A0; Sun, 15 May 2022 16:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018C3111497; Sun, 15 May 2022 19:13:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB467111496; Sun, 15 May 2022 19:13:40 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <165258619936.63327.15099276363763560797@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 19:13:40 -0400
Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates.all@ietf.org, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <70319862-090E-431C-AB1E-37D4498C84FA@vigilsec.com>
References: <165258619936.63327.15099276363763560797@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/4i6E8-m0rormClDD0P3fnlJajmQ>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [lamps] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-18
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 23:13:46 -0000
As stated in the shepherd writeup: When this update was started, the number of updates was expected to be smaller. It is recognized that complex update documents place a burden on implementers. So, when LAMPS WG tries to progress CMP to Internet Standard, a bis document will be produced to combine the base specification and the updates. Russ > On May 14, 2022, at 11:43 PM, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-18 > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review Date: 2022-05-14 > IETF LC End Date: 2022-05-11 > IESG Telechat date: 2022-06-02 > > Summary: > This document describes the changes to the Certificate Management protocol and > explains why the changes are needed. The description is very clear. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > Will the updated CMP be published as a whole? instead of requiring readers to > refer to multiple RFCs? > > Thanks, Linda Dunbar > > > _______________________________________________ > Spasm mailing list > Spasm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
- [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-l… Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- Re: [Gen-art] [lamps] Genart last call review of … Russ Housley
- Re: [Gen-art] [lamps] Genart last call review of … Brockhaus, Hendrik
- Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review… Lars Eggert