IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 21 December 2016 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5501A1295CF for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:10:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3SzmGAOpfh8M for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D2FE12956D for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:10:03 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-e83ff7000000561e-32-585ae199a00e
Received: from ESESSHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.42]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 35.54.22046.991EA585; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:10:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.169]) by ESESSHC008.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.42]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:10:01 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew.kerwin@qut.edu.au>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14
Thread-Index: AQHSSiwdHMurdzVghEWp7tWnuH9XBKDvum+AgAAtkID///Z+gIABeCoAgAph6QCAAFppgIAKeOyAgAxr/mA=
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:09:59 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4BF4068A@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <D463284D.13C45%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <1480417219.3456208.802284185.4E1FFAE0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <D46342E0.13C89%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <1480424961.3484823.802399049.16AD2DC8@webmail.messagingengine.com> <D464779E.13DC0%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <MWHPR01MB267051AD43A6869B9FD1CBE5BE850@MWHPR01MB2670.prod.exchangelabs.com> <D46D78D5.14367%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <MWHPR01MB2670EDFE3058053E7D5C1DF6BE9B0@MWHPR01MB2670.prod.exchangelabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR01MB2670EDFE3058053E7D5C1DF6BE9B0@MWHPR01MB2670.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.154]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01D25BD6.F996E330"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrEIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7lu6sh1ERBrem81rsf3+IyWLBQRWL q68+s1jsmneU1YHFY+epA2weS5b8ZPLYs/4Lm8eXy5/ZAliiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDL2Lj/L UrAlrGLH2eVMDYyHArsYOTkkBEwkbi75zd7FyMUhJLCOUWLn6stMEM4SRokfPxeydTFycLAJ WEh0/9MGiYsINDJKdP88wwrSzSyQKzHz2F1WkBphAQeJxw2mIGERAUeJt/ubWSDsJImV7bMZ QWwWAVWJxe3/2EBsXgFfietf3rFB7PrNLLF9/xywmZwCkRKXNz0Ba2YUEJP4fmoNE8QucYlb T+YzQVwtIvHw4mk2CFtU4uXjf6wQtpLEotufwR5gFuhllFj9fCMjxDZBiZMzn7BMYBSZhWTW LGR1s5DUQRQZSNw/1MEKYWtLLFv4mhnCtpaY8esgG4StKDGl+yE7hG0q8froR8YFjByrGEWL U4uLc9ONjPVSizKTi4vz8/TyUks2MQJj8+CW37o7GFe/djzEKMDBqMTD+2FGVIQQa2JZcWXu IUYVoDmPNqy+wCjFkpefl6okwlt6DyjNm5JYWZValB9fVJqTWnyIUZqDRUmc12zl/XAhgfTE ktTs1NSC1CKYLBMHp1QD47prTOldbm7ZW6UfqOx+2rHkZo7v5uatr5Ik7zieieZLWSUk4sdr s3M/X9/3tFiNKuV3CYaxc0/Lra98FOilcuPouahrsiJfwrLNV3U/EFx/clXzH6mQxAXHlGc1 bbp7dS77zIvP+lPCt98X/sE98UHX4vN52g4JZ/NVV65n+nG/tW7X74NtEkosxRmJhlrMRcWJ ADrfxWDVAgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/4vPllTX8B_YsVJar-uui7N6F8i8>
Cc: "draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:10:08 -0000

Hi Matthew,

Sorry for the late response.

I had a look at version -15 (and also -16), and I am ok with the changes.

Thanks!

Regards,

Christer

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Kerwin [mailto:matthew.kerwin@qut.edu.au] 
Sent: 14 December 2016 01:28
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>; Alexey Melnikov
<aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14

Hi,

From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:23
>
> Hi,
>
>>Thanks for the review, it dovetails nicely with other feedback I've 
>>received.
>>
>>Elsewhere this text has been suggested for the abstract:
>>
>>> This document provides a full specification of the "file" Uniform 
>>> Resource Identifier (URI) scheme, replacing the very brief definition 
>>> in Section 3.10 of RFC 1738.
>>
>>Does that go some way to resolve the ambiguity there? It doesn't use 
>>the words "update" or "obsolete" but it seems to me that it says what 
>>it needs to.
>
>I am fine with ³replace² :)
>
>Regards,
>
>Christer


I've published version 15, could you please have a look and see if it
addresses your questions?  The pertinent changes are:

* The abstract now says basically what I quoted above.  I think the
rewording resolves most of your original questions about what is being
updated and how.

* There is some text in the introduction around the exceptions to
"compatible with most existing usages."  Basically it points to the very
loose description in RFC1738, and the gradual tightening of specs since then
which "file:" otherwise avoided.  There's also a pointer to Appendix A
"Differences from Previous Specifications".

* The acknowledgements section has been rewritten, and now has no formal
callbacks to the previous RFCs or drafts.

Cheers

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email