[Gen-art] draft-ietf-ccwg-ratelimited-increase-04 ietf last call Genart review
Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 06 July 2026 23:44 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.22.242] (gaia.k8s.ietf.org [4.156.85.76]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E1011163953; Mon, 6 Jul 2026 16:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1783381442; bh=wSWpucvlgUXSkZa9YVreo9qoUWH4U76Z4fW8WZVP3zg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:Date; b=unjD2hYXF5okDJ+n6tgPqW1FKgcO3cyD+Zk0epbZkwK7ivLKYApQm28ZzE1YSsf20 xCxapBcR+J1wZTTIPbw0VOHBNcv4CyCeRXl8BUeMzoqkN9vYQ6MyvjE2yNhFwnjV+O NIuXUgmwubh3FmCrdqx214y0Xt5VvU/lqnNnhJ+8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.68.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <178338144246.335654.2839993070216461448@dt-datatracker-57b5d8f849-zrqfx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 16:44:02 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: AWSM4FWVUJF5B4VAJSKGKLKHT3SFCNPI
X-Message-ID-Hash: AWSM4FWVUJF5B4VAJSKGKLKHT3SFCNPI
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-gen-art.ietf.org-0; header-match-gen-art.ietf.org-1; header-match-gen-art.ietf.org-2; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ccwg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccwg-ratelimited-increase.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Subject: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-ccwg-ratelimited-increase-04 ietf last call Genart review
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/58zTCrVOodfHiUrWiuwW0pLChqE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:gen-art-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gen-art-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gen-art-leave@ietf.org>
Document: draft-ietf-ccwg-ratelimited-increase
Title: Increase of the Congestion Window when the Sender Is Rate-Limited
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.
Document: draft-ietf-ccwg-ratelimited-increase-04
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2026-07-06
IETF LC End Date: 2026-07-10
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary: This document specifies how congestion controlled transport protocols
should increase the congestion window when the sender is rate limited
Major issues: None
Minor issues:
- Appendix B.5.2 says that the text in Section 5.1 of RFC 4341 “is updated by
this document. But the document header says the document updates RFC 5681, RFC
9002, RFC 9260, and RFC 9438. Missing RFC4341. Is it intended?
- Section 2.1 defines both “cwnd-limited” and “rate-limited” as “A TCP flow
...”, Does it mean that the mechanism specified by this document doesn't apply
to QUIC or SCTP flows?
Nits/editorial comments:
- Section 2.1, the references appear malformed:
“{Section 4.5.3 of of ?RFC7661}” and “{Section 3 of ?RFC7661}”.
-Appendix B.1.2: s/perfomed/performed/
-Appendix B.5.2: s/specifing/specifying/
Best Regards,
Linda
- [Gen-art] draft-ietf-ccwg-ratelimited-increase-04… Linda Dunbar via Datatracker