Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-01

"jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Thu, 08 December 2016 06:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5F012964E; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 22:21:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mAwDiGop32Do; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 22:21:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x241.google.com (mail-pf0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01329129600; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 22:21:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id c4so21767283pfb.3; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 22:21:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5v6uNzV2F49hnUEoLR5J3qJ/N4n4DlWQRhgPpP6D08s=; b=zE+sSW2/FoSh5CBt+7jO0ijlc9P1tzUAW3un2ejx/mNyI+wILSyorxS4jTtKOof7EW NQCzLnBABckkbCdAKFKyDWh6HGpsSyFTyxrXqJpXSv6giQE/bYsa92hIPxC6X86+e4bI 1SlA88cZsMa+a3mtko2kBlyVhTFdOnkO5Hf89YR0U0wTnbfJc0+7O0ZvOW9j5JXIU9K0 OGhDNMILfRsr90O6idHVIDUyzWA3MU4ZhhKvnTwlW+mFVv/NF7loudMo8vTTZlRHprLA qZGICgllbZITrmwefnJfA7dGNaKZGnX8CKalvCxZirQMiYJqTVNUw3PghaGvUhE4JBRK CX4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5v6uNzV2F49hnUEoLR5J3qJ/N4n4DlWQRhgPpP6D08s=; b=DdHzgPSJpcsKKTUJ7ZliOqye6sojJ9v8Q2acG2vcbL8Ipat472SJePZVhPTgpxM6Ov n+NKMUPxMPzHGkcswXiZRuxAqDjbRc5w2tZdPOIhVIi7JAvL89vdMsPGxCbbeGNdAYNR Dq+ZxO9xfqVzmC88ZqgXE0u2z5+BdT6/y41LgA/35piygqgzwLLZMCASHsuuVqeRBcgz 0R0paFCVhA6PdYwoyniBfSZQhEOaMfW6rpnaEe0EfRDAiuzbAaLRILEcfbwo1eGZNMnc 3uL/DXj3b24aVPHh7j4YagiK1sATsYALyjQdS4IhfTrgj1S101JWoCbB10kuIOpg27a0 T2VQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03Zz7HYzuxDjTifVRnIX4zg28t4Lm9byYsQPvyhWFRu+EN9uJZ2nTEpSjhaYiCdBw==
X-Received: by 10.99.133.200 with SMTP id u191mr126991209pgd.28.1481178099474; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 22:21:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4200:e520:7d5a:2f7:9e37:3e43? ([2601:647:4200:e520:7d5a:2f7:9e37:3e43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l11sm46913583pfb.28.2016.12.07.22.21.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Dec 2016 22:21:38 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: "jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <337ddd16-232b-6fee-d910-eb3d35a0e874@trigofacile.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 22:21:36 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2A345AB1-1064-4546-87B1-F54F8EEB2EB1@gmail.com>
References: <148090444981.5523.17374875997079514429.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <337ddd16-232b-6fee-d910-eb3d35a0e874@trigofacile.com>
To: Julien ÉLIE <julien@trigofacile.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/5AaI7Spm49bN7fhRTp78B6x0tLQ>
Cc: draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations.all@ietf.org, "General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 06:21:42 -0000

Hi Julien,

What you propose below is what I was thinking about. So yes, OK with that.

Thanks,
	Jouni


> On Dec 7, 2016, at 1:19 PM, Julien ÉLIE <julien@trigofacile.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jouni,
> 
> First of all, thanks for having taken time to review the document.
> 
> 
>> I think this document is ready for publication.
>> 
>> I have comment, which is just a suggestion concerning document
>> structure. Currently the updates/changes to RFC4642 are listed in
>> Introduction. On the other hand there is a specific section for
>> recommendations. I would move the updates/changes to RFC4642 into its
>> own section just to make the document a bit more structured.
> 
> Is it OK if I move from Section 1 "Introduction", the part "Notably, this document updates [RFC4642]... of [RFC7525] instead." to a new Section 2 "Updates/Changes to RFC 4642"?
> I'll then drop "Notably" in the pasted wording, and mention that detailed changes are listed in Appendix A of the document.
> The "Recommendations" Section becomes Section 3, and so on.
> 
> Or did you have something else in mind?
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> -- 
> Julien ÉLIE
> 
> « – Tu n'as rien remarqué d'étrange chez cet Arverne ?
>  – Oui, son accent. » (Astérix)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art