[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-minrank-hysteresis-of-10.txt

"Miguel A. Garcia" <Miguel.A.Garcia@ericsson.com> Tue, 08 May 2012 07:28 UTC

Return-Path: <miguel.a.garcia@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090D721F84B8 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 00:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.214
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.214 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9zr8eDMIhXtm for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 00:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3387021F8484 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2012 00:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7c78ae000006de5-51-4fa8cb33c2b6
Authentication-Results: mailgw7.ericsson.se x-tls.subject="/CN=esessmw0237"; auth=fail (cipher=AES128-SHA)
Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client CN "esessmw0237", Issuer "esessmw0237" (not verified)) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 7D.F1.28133.33BC8AF4; Tue, 8 May 2012 09:28:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [159.107.24.244] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 8 May 2012 09:28:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4FA8CB32.8080709@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 09:28:50 +0200
From: "Miguel A. Garcia" <Miguel.A.Garcia@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gnawali@cs.uh.edu, pal@cs.stanford.edu, jpv@cisco.com, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-minrank-hysteresis-of-10.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 07:28:54 -0000

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-roll-minrank-hysteresis-of-10.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <Miguel.A.Garcia@ericsson.com>
Review Date: 2012-05-08
IESG Telechat date: 2012-05-10

Summary: The document is ready for publication as a standards track RFC

Major issues: none

Minor issues: none

Nits/editorial comments:

I reviewed version -07 of this document. At that time, I had a few 
editorial comments, and all of them but one have been addressed in 
version -10. The comment that has not been address is included here again 
for your consideration:

- Section 3.1. Towards the end of the section, the sentence reads:

    The path cost corresponding to a neighbor SHOULD be re-computed each
    time:

and then there are 3 conditions numbered from 1 to 3. It is not clear if 
the path cost should be recomputed when all of the 3 conditions are met, 
or when any of the 3 conditions are met. In other words, it is not clear 
if the 3 bullet points are an "AND" or an "OR" operation among then. 
Presumably they are an "OR". If this is the case, perhaps the sentence 
should be rephrased as:

    The path cost corresponding to a neighbor SHOULD be re-computed each
    time any of the following conditions are met:



/Miguel
-- 
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain