Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Tue, 19 June 2018 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B2B1310CD; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 02:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gb73jYVUNdNB; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 02:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EE591310CA; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 02:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id o13-v6so18701343wmf.4; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 02:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=QgU/QsXunmQXr2g6cUmciYee9IKDE56w+y0ke9LbBeQ=; b=e5tTs4KZpAj9axItbqD5okoD8fs0dOHsz56GOuTXZE0ib+WELl3jMe2enCpMx8Yw7M inlYmwtXLxzp3f09HgpGMUMG0PIbnWnSTUervnSx2fONGtL1cpy8RRxOlbGm7jQ17yr5 3WNQoAJ33F8AOVlI0KpeBjnO2Ih1zRhZSxYG0OVSEMZxfPtvoNQXDgbBo3oT+zB9sv9S pfk51neahDJf1PJy4VJRvJFz2P9cG0zvMps8qAP+yLzNLLBp//8Jw7MCzMRwQRP9Nzg+ +urzioPFGnxTRlFh9JUudob07vbgpZhIX18XyK9UwVBAtLogD36UIPP6VDe5imfnfPiB AnIA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=QgU/QsXunmQXr2g6cUmciYee9IKDE56w+y0ke9LbBeQ=; b=a9TCO0V2TTo4G7ZhPCUj4wYxArNZlnmUYlHLDyvolqSCrmctAPFZ2P/SEATL58SIiS BHh+diTA1yijW8Ecro+EuY1tHYb0JDqGDEW3p4R1t4gE3kMFcpYuyXkWVOv+gOx5c3A6 E7+ZEh7qy5yD181ieSIaad34c92w4vQCUNkJCBjb5cgwMJCtQBKQtcepLGiHU7nsaD7E ZwO2cWR+mFlbbdx3C8bxiegE71bGKfUvT2vbdQsdTJtsn+twRYfinWUWb9e7nFS7YTpD oqEevdctHnCW2cvOi2clRmAo2EjTaQAsjm+qFAG+NpMg8ElLE9BS1W5hdIpohuI75utH JHwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E04sypIrkZ/Kr3uitkjRwTaFJUz1cxKspq0ppuZu5gnhBqqsdfn UgkNQQi5PCetxTzfbbQpQpM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIqeRQWGI6BZwEATZssViS+2umlBJxY6e1MXl9uul2wNScXgHK+eOClXmWq/UXKMrwfs9t/Jw==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:d7c3:: with SMTP id o186-v6mr10898966wmg.67.1529400969913; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 02:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.105] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n71-v6sm14214669wmi.14.2018.06.19.02.36.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 02:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw.all@ietf.org, pals@ietf.org, "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
References: <152877425096.2652.654313340478370473@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA=duU0QiNEnywWor0qzLMwunA4_XaCHOOiOnrAZt_XXadVLEQ@mail.gmail.com> <22883AA3-E923-4294-95AD-9DC1C7E37391@cooperw.in>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d1005839-65cf-78f5-4395-feb93b6cfe5d@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:35:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <22883AA3-E923-4294-95AD-9DC1C7E37391@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------0D1B87CA22C1181D4C9B255C"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/5g4_ZZuGm_80GHJBDplf6H6znNA>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:36:15 -0000

Hi Alissa

Yes, we will address all review comments that we receive.

- Stewart



On 18/06/2018 18:44, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Brian, thanks for your review. Andy, thanks for your response; 
> hopefully it means Brian’s comments will be addressed? I have entered 
> a No Objection ballot.
>
> Alissa
>
>> On Jun 12, 2018, at 1:50 PM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:agmalis@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Brian,
>>
>> Thanks, your comments are much appreciated.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:30 PM, Brian Carpenter 
>> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
>>     Review result: Ready with Nits
>>
>>     Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06
>>
>>     I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>>     Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>>     by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>>     like any other last call comments.
>>
>>     For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>     <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq
>>     <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>.
>>
>>     Document: draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06.txt
>>     Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
>>     Review Date: 2018-06-12
>>     IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-15
>>     IESG Telechat date: 2018-06-21
>>
>>     Summary: Ready with nits
>>     --------
>>
>>     Comments:
>>     ---------
>>
>>     This (with RFC4928) is a wonderful example of why layer
>>     violations are a Bad Thing.
>>
>>     Nits:
>>     -----
>>
>>     > 1.  Introduction
>>     ....
>>     >   This document recommends the use of the Ethernet pseudowire
>>     control
>>     >   word in all but exceptional circumstances.
>>
>>     That's wrong, it *mandates* this usage with a MUST (first
>>     paragraph of section 4).
>>
>>     > 3.  Background
>>     ....
>>     >   A recent posting on the Nanog email list has highlighted this
>>     >   problem:
>>     >
>>     >
>>     https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-December/089395.html
>>     <https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-December/089395.html>
>>
>>     No, it's no longer recent. How about:
>>
>>        For example, a posting on the Nanog email list highlighted this
>>        problem:
>>
>>     > 7.  Operational Considerations
>>     >
>>     >   CW presence on the PW is controlled by the configuration and
>>     may be
>>     >   subject to default operational mode of not being enabled.
>>
>>     That sentence is hard to parse. Try this:
>>
>>        A configuration switch might determine whether the CW is used
>>     on the PW.
>>        The default configuration might be to disable use of the CW.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gen-art mailing list
>> Gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:Gen-art@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>