Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-tram-stunbis-16
Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org> Thu, 03 May 2018 23:32 UTC
Return-Path: <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFBA12DA43; Thu, 3 May 2018 16:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cerg0jQPQGpF; Thu, 3 May 2018 16:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implementers.org (unknown [92.243.22.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0D0212DA48; Thu, 3 May 2018 16:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:0:53aa:64c:18b5:3a25:f31a:9fd] (unknown [IPv6:2001:0:53aa:64c:18b5:3a25:f31a:9fd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C347FAE844; Fri, 4 May 2018 01:32:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
To: Dale Worley <worley@ariadne.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-tram-stunbis.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, tram@ietf.org
References: <152237792217.20556.13689609450529144296@ietfa.amsl.com> <d7edd60c-634b-1f2e-0482-0cd706c48b92@petit-huguenin.org>
Message-ID: <28aabbd3-db27-87a8-2b62-18ecab661d22@petit-huguenin.org>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 16:32:30 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d7edd60c-634b-1f2e-0482-0cd706c48b92@petit-huguenin.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/6NMc3nTJci2R36wBEBEjnWF12sM>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-tram-stunbis-16
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 23:32:40 -0000
On 04/16/2018 02:49 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: > Thanks again for the review. Comments inline. > > On 03/30/2018 04:45 AM, Dale Worley wrote: >> Reviewer: Dale Worley >> Review result: Ready with Nits >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by >> the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your >> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> <https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-tram-stunbis-16 >> Reviewer: Dale R. Worley >> Review Date: 2018-03-29 >> IETF LC End Date: 2018-02-20 >> IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-19 >> >> Summary: >> >> This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits >> that should be fixed before publication. >> >> The only interesting item concerns section 17.1, where the assignment >> of meanings to bits in the "security feature set" value is different >> from the assignment in -16. This is either non-upward-compatible with >> -16, or there is an error in either -16 or -17. >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> There is an issue that shows up in several places: The NAT may >> forward the request using an IP family that is different from the IP >> family that it received the request using. This means that the >> "source IP family of the request" may depend on whether one is >> speaking of the client or the server. The draft is cognizant of this, >> and mentions its consequences in sections 6.3.3 and 12. But this also >> has consequences for ALTERNATE-SERVER: Section 14.15 says "The IP >> address family MUST be identical to that of the source IP address of >> the request." even though that family might not be usable by the >> client. The draft doesn't seem to explicitly say that this comes from >> address-switching by the NAT. It would help if there was a >> higher-level discussion of this matter, pointing to the various >> consequences. > > I still do not have text about that but, as this is blocking this response since 2 weeks now, I am releasing it as is and will come back to that after I process the other reviews that accumulated during my time traveling around Europe. > Because we believe that this is a problem that will become more and more frequent, we decided to fix it, at least for new implementations. Please have a look at -17 and let us know what you think of it. Thanks.
- [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-tr… Dale Worley
- Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart telechat review of dr… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart telechat review of dr… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart telechat review of dr… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart telechat review of dr… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart telechat review of dr… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart telechat review of dr… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart telechat review of dr… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart telechat review of dr… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart telechat review of dr… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart telechat review of dr… Marc Petit-Huguenin