Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-03
Nobo Akiya <nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com> Sun, 30 August 2015 06:54 UTC
Return-Path: <nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D561B2C18 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tsqptx98t-tm for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 794071A1B64 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbtg9 with SMTP id tg9so46787412lbb.1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=updxU6BwBOgNXZWPagfm6LqdmD1nRuahAuoUNnMj7YI=; b=NEYKlx9bvlE/VTcNsRBzYFzQ1MjkFBmUBXaN8g7i9Kw92iiseggYAeLsKqCNwwiWG0 9hXoqT1SiJxMfw8ldpLCgu2+4n7KwUshT0dAgtKtKnjDB0WtD3YvZsUznhHGlIQDWVTH KH4FLDF0zfA1EtWiKtCn+kNnCC/ljFAWzGwysWDpHKk3hvs5QbbQfHQfSiFMwtehITEh tPlWyLD/f446gf2VaphrBaK9o6YcQmuyGiXIApSebgAK5bF52K6jh03IVMKKK2WAqTIS LGUg3Th+vNSjMkFedJ0JJyQj/mbYlOmBhjbSR7ocbi01FcWOWiNXqsJcWqdHgZ0uVKra +aAw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.25.196 with SMTP id e4mr7988579lag.15.1440917684843; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.12.198 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55D9DC53.1050307@gmail.com>
References: <55D9DC53.1050307@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:54:44 +0900
Message-ID: <CAFqGwGsJj8rpAxrhonuOYoF7tVJ5GVHLq-HZmV1G2hTwThd5Nw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nobo Akiya <nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com>
To: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0158cb82c17d2d051e81ca58"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/6OpmbMhN7a3LpgSRSU5aUrnsZ00>
Cc: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@mail101.huawei.com>, Gen Art <gen-art@ietf.org>, "Mach (Guoyi) Chen" <mach.chen@huawei.com>, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, Deborah Brungard <dbrungard@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:54:48 -0000
Hello Tom, Many thank you for reviewing this document. Please see replies in-line with [NOBO]. On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-03 > Reviewer: Tom Taylor > Review Date: 2015-08-21 > IETF LC End Date: 2015-09-03 > IESG Telechat date: TBD > > Summary: Ready with nits. A number of missing "the"s noted but left to the > RFC Editor. > > [NOBO] I will have one of the native English speakers go through the document to add missing "the"s. > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > IDNits notes that draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping has now been published as > RFC 7555. > > [NOBO] Thanks, I have updated the reference to RFC 7555. > Sec. 3, third line: s/carry ordered/carry an ordered/ > > [NOBO] Accepted. > Sec. 3.2, paragraph following bullet 9: > s/The responder LSR is to select/The responder LSR MUST (SHOULD?) select/ > Begin next sentence with "The". > [NOBO] Good comment. Yes I agree that we should use "SHOULD" here. "MUST" is probably ok, but I can see users potentially arguing for local policies to be given precedence, hence "SHOULD" is the right way to go. I have made changes in my local copy. There is another set of review comments that came in. Once those are also addressed, I will publish the document. Again, thank you for reviewing the document Tom! Regards, Nobo