Re: [Gen-art] [OAUTH-WG] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-22.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 08 October 2012 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6983721F86C2 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 04:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.403
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.403 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.804, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YGS8jXesG1kR for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 04:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 75A2221F86B2 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 04:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Oct 2012 11:45:56 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 08 Oct 2012 13:45:56 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18K+ktyY/AKDk6Dy+Oy58N6mIg4K9eZCi5K69hR+U nsQTr8XL7fv4tE
Message-ID: <5072BCEE.60807@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:45:50 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436673769B@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <5006A010.60408@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <5006A010.60408@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer.all@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [OAUTH-WG] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-22.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:45:58 -0000

On 2012-07-18 13:37, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> On 17/07/2012 19:01, Mike Jones wrote:
>> You should actually probably make that name change request to the
>> HTTPbis working group.  I suspect that if they decide to change the
>> name, that we could direct the RFC editor to make the same name change
>> as HTTPbis does.
> It looks like the discussion of changing this in HTTPBIS is in progress
> now.

We made that change in HTTPbis, but bearer still seems to use 
"b64token". Can this be fixed in AUTH48???

Best regards, Julian