[Gen-art] GenART LC review of draft-ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors-03

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Sun, 15 July 2012 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D277821F85A3; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.599, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bOOv+3nAAsqI; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B537E21F85A8; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibhm11 with SMTP id hm11so1585028wib.13 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=H2EoBUO8kLeX/MLpLbUDMbnFiv/eCy5m4iq+iNs0cjM=; b=j8LvMHKMESS53+j7IjBobufEP/686YWlVpcqTbbfBZr1x9N4E8xengmOvZ1J1NbgsB vNcEdHeSHVS3+6jZT5xa8S9J1GhHzYF88tui2IlzW30S9wt+PniKZV5WQ9DEDiclZq1j 5AzV4wpzl9KJA584B8MzcNx90PxMZ/TJDo7Fi7OnAu84b4kggNWKIC90zcIgA+8H0/HN FeaYHGXWIqjoVuFBKpQHFXuz5+TvtDi2fGie5t+GI5ioQvg9ezBGSmGkSmYc0PfYuWix RM8iTYzlEI8gvFWQZ450kQSTf7zUCtdZvu9iDQ1PTvlPZxDENrHkg7gJ7jPxBbeFDRMp 7XjQ==
Received: by 10.180.109.166 with SMTP id ht6mr10897352wib.11.1342357269842; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniE (bzq-79-176-214-12.red.bezeqint.net. [79.176.214.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y5sm15605150wiw.9.2012.07.15.06.01.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: <draft-ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors.all@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:00:26 +0200
Message-ID: <009701cd6292$311290e0$9337b2a0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0098_01CD62A2.F49C9960"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac1iki+TBxbsG2rNRoSY8XYYwfuipQ==
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] GenART LC review of draft-ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 13:00:31 -0000

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

 

Document: draft-ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors-03.

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2012-7-15

IETF LC End Date: 2012-7-17

IESG Telechat date:

 

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

 

Major issues:

 

Minor issues:

1.       The registration procedure should mention NetFlow V9 expert review
for 0-128. I think that in the IANA section it will be good to suggest
update also for the Registration procedure and Reference of the IPFIX
Information Elements registry.

2.       Section 5.1 should reference RFC5226 and say if it clarifies
RFC5226 or adds some procedure.

3.       In section 5.2 is there a need for a specification to explain the
change. The text is not clear about it.

4.       Section 5.3 say "Names of deprecated or obsolete Information
Elements MUST NOT be reused." What about the elementID can it be re-used?

 

 

 

 

Nits/editorial comments:

 

1.       Section 4.2 third paragraph "applications can to use reduced-size"
should be "applications can use reduced-size"

2.       Section 4.8 first paragraph "enumerates those which Information
Elements" should be "enumerates those Information Elements"

3.       In section 10.1 "these are described in and Section 10.3" I did not
understand the "in and", I assume something is missing here.