Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] last call reviews of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-12 (and -15)

"Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com> Tue, 23 August 2022 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jgould@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81F5C159487; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 05:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VRjlrx4y8ys1; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 05:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.verisign.com (mail1.verisign.com [72.13.63.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A094AC152702; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 05:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=18704; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1661258765; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=/laz+L1AQFASndhq/3iqKqs/hhvAObjLrJ56NfMoHc0=; b=JsCGmfmnSJ4A5V7O0CgjNot1jAP4kDNIBKeI3wtzKpcF3eWWx5sdzli7 4pgmo7EM+GJSzPj9xWuspEqIO34ejvbFeFTSNg6yn8gHACxwMk7E6FgOz sB2Vc8E+sP1LxxMIiEo/aA0GbJ/qTkSeRJISufkeQA3BWko5T75jl/T1/ 4+trdcIt+AcuIP0FqyaYbh0ms2B+REWopaZQF5oeIfNASwyfPIX5qb7AQ aHaCOuBcZ0RBT838B3li4l0/8V0xAISS5CdTMuxAEIc1ZPAvjkWkCY1dx 2Quq1u63HrwnigOf83S+0ZyARk2+UyT6Cm6RBRJ8ztkkJqc3SuybmKCls g==;
IronPort-Data: A9a23:cL0UP6q7bUnZyLIXZ6kdbF3Ac95eBmIRZRIvgKrLsJaIsI4StFGz/ 9Ym7Vv2Y6LbNTf1e9hoKNPhxf41yZ7WzNEySgY4rCgxH3gWoMCfWInDJEmhYn7KcpfNRU5rv 51CO9DLdZo+ESGErRzzaOW79CUgjPjZTOH1BL7PYHwZqWOIKcsEoUsLd7kR3tcx3LBVej+wh O4eg/EzGXf9hDN/bGxF5fvS8Elk4Pn56GhB7wwwa6hA7ACCy3UZUc5GdfC6IkWjT9gPFIZWZ QphIJKRpTqFokh3WrtJtp6hLyXml5aLZVDmZkJ+AvTk2F4azsAL+v5THOIGbktKgCm+kdl0y dFc3bS9Ug5B0pfkwYzxaDEFVXAlVUF60OWfeyLn4ZbIlxeun0bEmJ2CMmlnZeX0xc4qWQmix dRAQBgRYxaKgf6Bwb7TYoGAUex6caEHlKtG0p1R5Wmx4cQOGPgvcI2TjTNs5wrcs+gVdRroT 5FANWcwNkSojypnYT/7ALpm9AuhrienL20A8Dp5r4Jvi4TY5FQZPLQArLM50zFFLClYth/wm 47Iw4j2Kj4oC+K47z2iyCLvm/GfxynkH74/FaLto5aGgHXLroASIDcscwKEh9SJ0hT4RdlYM VRS8yZos7Ip8gqgSdyVsx+Q+SbC50FHHYMNSKtmuWlhyYKNi+qdLmoLSSNFZPQ4udU3Xj0l0 BmCmNaB6TlH6ezNECLGruj8QTWaYAIWIEUyfxI+cigVu9DC+LAO1xmXd4M2eEKyppivcd3q+ BiAoSwygrQPpcEO3qS/u1vAhlqEpJ/JSEs06xnZdmCu7UVyY4vNT5Sh53DD5PhcIY2ZCEKM1 FAGlM+D6OxbUcmTmTaMW+QCGvei4POtPDjVm1UpHpQ9+XKq4XHLVYlK/Bl/KVtndMEedlfBb FXatx8U5ZJPMj6wYKB6c570BtwyiKXpFJLsUvT8b9dSbN52bgDv1CVnflLV1GnplGAtnL0xf 5CBfq6EF3sVBLR75Du7W+lb1qUkrgg/nDPVSZHh5xWqzbTYY2SaIZ8KPV3LZ/olxKKJvAuT9 MxQX/Zm0D1VSuunfS/a4dZJaEsUNz4+BIuzocsRfPSFe0x4AnonTfTWxNvNZrBYokicrc+Ql lnVZ6OS4AOn7ZEbAW1mskxeVY4=
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:soptWKvpOGItzkHolgJZB2lB7skDQdV00zEX/kB9WHVpm5Sj5q KTdPRy73PJYUUqKRQdcLG7SdG9qBznlaKdjbN6AV7AZnichILLFvAA0WKK+VSJcBEWndQz6U 4USclD4arLY2SS4/yW3ODyKadF/DDOytHOuQ+VpU0dKz2CRZsQljtENg==
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,257,1654560000"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="19018307"
Received: from BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.48) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:45:40 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.173.153.48]) by BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.173.153.48]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.031; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:45:40 -0400
From: "Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com>
To: "beldmit@gmail.com" <beldmit@gmail.com>, "john-ietf@jck.com" <john-ietf@jck.com>
CC: "paf@paftech.se" <paf@paftech.se>, "jgould=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org" <jgould=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>, "i18ndir@ietf.org" <i18ndir@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Re: Re: Re: [Last-Call] last call reviews of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-12 (and -15)
Thread-Index: AQHYtu5AGgNaGaWi+UmRpx7Z1QsAUQ==
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:45:40 +0000
Message-ID: <D79B4629-296A-4EF6-BCE1-BA4D4F771663@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.62.22061100
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_D79B4629296A4EF6BCE1BA4D4F771663verisigncom_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/7BPQ7cevoJgx-8ka8V7vzcB40Cc>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] last call reviews of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-12 (and -15)
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:46:09 -0000

The requirement of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai is to add support for SMTPUTF8 email addresses in EPP.  Changing the cardinality (one to two or one to many) for e-mail addresses in EPP extensions, such as RFC 5733 and RFC 8543, is a different requirement that can be addressed with a different EPP extension, and the decision of whether to require an all-ASCII e-mail address would be up to server policy and not the protocol itself.

--

JG

[cid:image001.png@01D8B6CC.B929FD30]

James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgould@Verisign.com<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgould@Verisign.com>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>

From: Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 at 2:43 AM
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: James Gould <jgould@verisign.com>, Patrik Fältström <paf@paftech.se>, "Gould, James" <jgould=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, regext <regext@ietf.org>, "i18ndir@ietf.org" <i18ndir@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: Re: [Last-Call] last call reviews of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-12 (and -15)

Dear John
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, 04:27 John C Klensin, <john-ietf@jck.com<mailto:john-ietf@jck.com>> wrote:


--On Monday, August 22, 2022 16:01 +0000 "Gould, James"
<jgould@verisign.com<mailto:jgould@verisign.com>> wrote:

> John,
>
> How about if we change the approach to use the well-understood
> command-response extension?

If things were changed to create an extension type that is
defined in RFC 5730 rather than creating a new type, that would
certainly eliminate the need to update 5730 (or explain clearly
why that was not necessary).

That, of course, leaves the more substantive SMTPUTF8 issues,
particularly the need for a slot for an alternate all-ASCII
address.

No. SMTPUTF8 email address _is_ email address. Otherwise we are stuck with email addresses of first-class and of second-class forever.

We don't need separate slot for all-ASCII addresses.