IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc7001bis-08

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 11 May 2015 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29731B29FB; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YTwc7GWQwJrB; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x230.google.com (mail-pd0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D45A71B29FE; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdea3 with SMTP id a3so155674240pde.3; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h7N8SkVhhneJSRuc8SOQfos5+lIstXiSDNsb5etySdo=; b=0lLEBFVMXjeSFesdpdifWOrU13A3HLYjJ5UPKwFIZSv9bTBT3wLixCeB4TNGgSJdxf raWpDsZ4b7/avWoCl2R0Ng/ZZpG1ork0urkb6pxhEWX/6YolIb9h0tY60B0cVjl/FMUi VYWjpHvUZ8/XGrTxbuMATZeoAqmiCHR+8ADHG2WrBDZqe8Kd3lxwDMjNglPZEa8yxybH TAUjy2O8CYg1QD90xgls94zylDPgTzXGmOGAECXA3KNy3XfWhxS+RUkMcBvH6zaHwHhB lmIy4dYdurK7NB6p5Hwa1lYBiqMfTBBN58C62F52WakHc91ABhGPLVCFw0vBIT/UKZLk OVig==
X-Received: by 10.70.96.194 with SMTP id du2mr21860039pdb.108.1431373767552; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:54d7:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:54d7:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mt11sm13892124pbc.20.2015.05.11.12.49.23 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 May 2015 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <555107BF.2040307@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 07:49:19 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
References: <554C00EE.6050803@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZoUDOHxPjb0SZxGnW9s0o9LA9TXWWPY6jhyHNivjbSLQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZoUDOHxPjb0SZxGnW9s0o9LA9TXWWPY6jhyHNivjbSLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/7Z1OBpIyPRI7Rm0pD9hyVyhQzi4>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc7001bis.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc7001bis-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:49:35 -0000

Hi,

The -09 version resolves my comments completely, thanks!

   Brian

On 08/05/2015 12:26, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     It seems the author didn't see my Last Call review, so this review has not changed.
> 
> 
> Nope, I hadn't.  Apologies for that.
>  
> 
>     As the writeup says, this is an update to a long document that mainly resolves a
>     notified erratum and some oversights in the previous version's IANA material.
>     Therefore I did not review the whole document. As far as I can tell, the changes
>     reflect the description in the writeup. (I assume that IANA will work with the
>     author to get the registry updates exactly right.)
> 
> 
> Yes, that's already happening behind the scenes.
>  
> 
>     Minor Issue:
>     ------------
> 
>     IMHO the "Change History" section should be summarised in a "Changes since RFC7001"
>     section (rather than being deleted).
> 
> 
> Sure, that seems a reasonable suggestion.
> 
>     Nit:
>     ----
> 
>     6.7.  SMTP Enhanced Stauts Codes
> 
>     s/Stauts/Status/
> 
> 
> Fixed for next version.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -MSK

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email