IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 30 August 2016 11:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B21B12D108; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A1T48DnuLMy3; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872FC12D0D8; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450D42CC9B; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:43:22 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9L6vQcyhr41m; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:43:21 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3892CC40; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:43:21 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D4766147-1D0A-4357-A1AE-E54093334249"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <F58C4344-0A36-431B-8F40-C668E96896FF@netapp.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:43:20 +0300
Message-Id: <F743A091-2C6B-4B97-B224-BFF0FE0A6572@piuha.net>
References: <b1dab089-fd46-a270-636f-87135691d036@gmail.com> <F58C4344-0A36-431B-8F40-C668E96896FF@netapp.com>
To: "Adamson, Andy" <William.Adamson@netapp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/8Tm8EoJUuN51lA2o5PvrUlGciIE>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:43:27 -0000

Brian, Andy, thanks for the reviews and changes and new versions.

I plan to ballot “no objection” for this document on Thursday.

That being said, I do note the BCP/PS question, and my own opinion is that BCP would have equal strength, and if it were up to me, I’d pick that category. However, I’m not religious about this — clearly you could go two ways on this.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email