Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1FF129961 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:10:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vsuQ-_-Ii0pU for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:10:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x243.google.com (mail-pg0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECA5F129C9E for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x243.google.com with SMTP id p66so5414177pga.2 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:06:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=C5GeY5Vw8bDswaoSZEfRICsR5L9TWBhtGM8ITM0JYhM=; b=f4OEARxXK7HYTKJW/nxH+DSbivfgiGJRev+SzHQiWYiXxvBsdjNwGoZ0+JbC1okZ/3 NqbLPEbYG1YjCS/gPaXTEurGrRoQdYZ8n8Id8sHT7JR7DeqHfs/TRYLJk9Jx7JhEg4AX 9aBgsEaGcY5iwufnCjowbXQ9JdooCGmAKTWc2TcLOyeD24qDZorfPqDiRt/1uGWbMlYt HKZnjwc/ARVro2aTJL5skgMSzSMyy+P+IEGjW08UAt6YSXbxp9PCVI3l4gJfKXcS9jnp kbGBg42OWqOmOIrnK9db98XB5BsFpaAQoUu/fXgNO22wC7MOslOnM+5E1EMcGtLOgSvY v8pw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=C5GeY5Vw8bDswaoSZEfRICsR5L9TWBhtGM8ITM0JYhM=; b=PnPk3B25zg7gMck0XjA7ohXDWI2jUj04DVFacpG6qNHfCbp2kkPNeMSh8nM2Ao4hB0 uVYYvMVt4FKHkKure6qF3aYsDAUQhfX2BjaUZ2FNzj3idOXIYws41aYCewrTaQZTwpZI kOORWEWFLnk77Xz9KNrsuiiC8bEKgUwq99TAUf/1UlEZGhmwLEWehTmEvH64quHS6D9J VPaW2pvxO4mp2UyBALY56WvgfL+cradryHDTeC2bg9cqazh8+OnNRHhYuJVO35E6uvln yS2kEp0OdSU36+4LGDeX4/wK9kFsXJz6aMobPdXnlxAr9v/kNzMwt0aB4pVlbGEYax6o A21Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03e8+z++eukkZKPrS+YY3CNzrTZFfO1rPWvJf9LTgqoufgVLccDYhhOSh3DYVYKcQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.246.83 with SMTP id u19mr71861461pgj.165.1480619210157; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:06:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v76sm1845007pfk.77.2016.12.01.11.06.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:06:49 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D9016372-718A-41D5-84AB-67A0E8F2172F@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:06:45 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B2E6A4F4-76A7-49C2-9368-B372153B7B4E@gmail.com>
References: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D572E1B66@dfweml501-mbb> <1cf67ddb-04c8-10d4-566a-4f2cc0475970@cisco.com> <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D572E282A@dfweml501-mbb> <CFAE9838-FA74-4281-A58D-775350F688D3@gmail.com> <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D572E28BC@dfweml501-mbb> <2DCF592F-78A7-492E-BE25-F1144AA3341E@gmail.com> <D9016372-718A-41D5-84AB-67A0E8F2172F@piuha.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/8Yq-z3h1joQBUwYLQwcTtGy9iDM>
Cc: "draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp@tools.ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Stig Venaas <stig@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 19:10:05 -0000

> Lucy,
> 
> Many thanks for your review.
> 
> Dino, Stig, does this discussion lead you to consider adding some clarifications to the document? I am not going to require those (just posted a no-obj for the document on today’s telechat), but wanted to give you an opportunity to consider that.
> 
> Jari

The base LISP multicast architecture is all explained in RFC6831. From the type of commentary from Lucy’s email, it led me to believe she (1) had not read RFC6831 or (2) did not understand the content of RFC6831.

Discussing how LISP multicast works in a PIM document is a misplacement of information and risks contradicting what is in the LISP published RFCs.

Dino