[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-redundancy-consider-02

Pete McCann <mccap@petoni.org> Tue, 24 April 2012 05:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mccap@petoni.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5301811E8081 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FuoagS0DLURw for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f172.google.com (mail-qc0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA0821F8483 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qcsq13 with SMTP id q13so175030qcs.31 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petoni.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vL/0R0+v45TqDpKLf4ZBA6W6syKS1OxMcZ0oWqvru8U=; b=ABVSLKf26dU3OrfiPJdDACrAa9zmNvFXO4I/umyGV3C3wxiXEPVuIc/GodumcmJ20c ZjwxTDotxeuKxR/dWAdr8f7cg4BpfPstQ2805yvNI92asVZB45yMM/HBr440YGl8z3B5 ENYjtIT/GujTo8r89wxfSvtgjCByXI5d1Wqro=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=vL/0R0+v45TqDpKLf4ZBA6W6syKS1OxMcZ0oWqvru8U=; b=ZjEULDYIbXEdKrx1s9HXTLjqPFkx9td10o6lL57zwf5hBjWArdGhQAFwTvoKrV4WN8 564sL9V/yv0CwV8SBzCgSf1jdBvJvx2eCjvsT09gJ1atzss0XMqO+ZLrjXmYiZg0Dm/T VynqufciFv4fHhiTlf5XSHNI6TNmVMxnpV4j1sXjYQ5Nyx8jaM3DQXPAh3oJu3TZfMB5 3d7lkZz8J3CFy694J+tsRgrspJHUBPLA3Ob9LIK/zSWrSKaUtSEa2P6k5+Niet3y7nhi Jua5PRu00EsHM4dELtOkDkSUmp8VMsQpe+8C5AzPUO7Yew9cX28z/2zxmpT0e+MPDSwi cqrg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.137.143 with SMTP id w15mr4532665qct.37.1335246103330; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.219.135 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [173.101.177.161]
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:41:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CACvMsLEAJ2oND1zXPAEvDn39XUvf-qfUA=-Kr9SmFhgMaY4H4w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pete McCann <mccap@petoni.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-redundancy-consider.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmah3Tb66louYVYfM8gCd2hplapIRT/vW4hvqYvG2KvIJbt8dpk8MUjbITnFx5dQNBl17SM
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-redundancy-consider-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:41:45 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-redundancy-consider-02
Reviewer: Peter McCann
Review Date: 2012-04-24
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: 2012-04-26

Summary: Ready (with nits)

Major issues: None

Minor issues:

Section 2.1:
   without any intermediate devices (like
   home routers used in service provider model).
SHOULD BE:
   with or without any intermediate devices.

Nits/editorial comments:

Abstract:
   those who
   wishing to use
SHOULD BE:
   those who
   wish to use

Section 2:
   The proposed architecture may be used in
   wide range of networks, two notable
SHOULD BE:
   While the proposed architecture may be used in
   a wide range of networks, two notable

   Although DHCPv6 redundancy may be useful in a wide range of
   scenarios, they may be generalized for illustration purposes in the
   two aforementioned.
SHOULD BE:
   Although DHCPv6 redundancy may be useful in a wide range of
   scenarios, we may generalize for illustration purposes from the
   two aforementioned scenarios.

   Clients requesting IPv6 addresses, prefixes, and or options care
   of DHCPv6
SHOULD BE:
   Clients requesting IPv6 addresses, prefixes, and or options by way
   of DHCPv6

   available until DHCPv6 protocol is standardized
SHOULD BE:
   available until a DHCPv6 failover protocol is standardized

Section 2.1:
   represents cases, where end-user devices
SHOULD BE:
  represents cases where end-user devices

   4.  CPE devices must implement a stateful DHCPv6 client [RFC3315],
       support for DHCPv6 prefix delegation [RFC3633] or stateless
       DHCPv6 [RFC3736] may also be implemented.
SHOULD BE:
   4.  CPE devices must implement a stateful DHCPv6 client [RFC3315];
       support for DHCPv6 prefix delegation [RFC3633] or stateless
       DHCPv6 [RFC3736] may also be implemented.

Section 3.1:
   Essential to the the use of
SHOULD BE:
   Essential to the use of

Section 5:
   In indentical prefixes scenario,
SHOULD BE:
   In the identical prefixes scenario,

   way how to solve
SHOULD BE:
   way to solve

   IPv6 lease data care of the DHCPv6 Leasequery
SHOULD BE:
   IPv6 lease data by way of the DHCPv6 Leasequery