Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09.txt

Thanks for your review, Suresh. Authors, can you take care of the address issue below?

Jari

On 29 Oct 2014, at 05:31, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote:

> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html)
> 
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
> or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09.txt
> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
> Review Date: 2013/10/28
> IESG Telechat date: 2013/10/30
> 
> 
> Summary: The document is almost ready for publication as Proposed 
> Standard, but I do have a comment you may wish to consider.
> 
> * Sections 5.2 and 5.3
> 
> -> The document uses some non-documentation addresses (AFAIK) in some of 
> the examples. e.g. 28.2.0.0/16 for an IPv4 prefix and 2600::/16 for an 
> IPv6 prefix. Is it possible to rewrite these examples using reserved 
> documentation addresses? Strangely enough, idnits does not seem to catch 
> them either.
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09.txt

Attachment: signature.asc