Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

(And I was still not sufficiently clear...)
The list for the expert to check is in the appendices.

Barry

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 8:31 AM Barry Leiba <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi, Dan.  Thanks for the review, and I’m sorry you didn’t get a response to your question before.
>
> Last part first: IANA does not normally make changes until the document is approved, and this is not an exception.
>
> The changes to the derived property values are described in detail in the text in Section 3.  The designated expert will need to check all that and generate a list of specific chaanges to the table here:
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/idna-tables-6.3.0/#idna-tables-properties
>
> ...and IANA will then apply those changes.
>
> Barry
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:31 AM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review result: Ready with Issues
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
>> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>>
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>
>> Document: draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review Date: 2019-03-18
>> IETF LC End Date: 2019-03-05
>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>>
>> Summary:
>>
>> This document is Ready. However, I have signaled one minor issue in my LC
>> review which was not addressed in the revision, neither have I seen an answer
>> to the clarification that I requested (unless I missed some mail).
>>
>> Major issues:
>>
>> Minor issues:
>>
>> (from my previous review, not addressed)
>>
>> The IANA Considerations text is not clear to me.
>>
>> > IANA is requested to update the IDNA Parameters registry of derived
>>    property values, after the expert reviewer validates that the derived
>>    property values are calculated correctly.
>>
>> What does this exactly say? Are these recommendations for future actions, or do
>> they refer specifically to property values described in this document? Are the
>> expert reviewer validation and IDNA Parameters registry update required to be
>> performed prior to approval of this document?
>>
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>
>>