[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipflow-meth-09.txt

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 16 March 2012 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D037521F8528 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.113
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.113 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.152, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vioqbOVOmcgs for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from morbo.mail.tigertech.net (morbo.mail.tigertech.net []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7416521F852C for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net []) by morbo.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FF6CD479 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3111C0891; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [] (pool-71-161-51-182.clppva.btas.verizon.net []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FE581C0884; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F6288CA.6070009@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:26:50 -0400
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>
References: <4F62737E.80004@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F62737E.80004@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
Subject: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipflow-meth-09.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:24:29 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipflow-meth-09.txt
     IP Flow Information Accounting and Export Benchmarking
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 15-March-2012
IETF LC End Date: 25-March-2012
IESG Telechat date: 12-April-2012

Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
    It is a very readable document.

Major issues:

Minor issues:
     The text says several times that the cache size of the DUT MUST be 
known in order to set up the tests described in the document.  I can 
understand why that is so.  But do typical routers actually document 
that in the user's manual?  Historically, manuals for routers would say 
that there is X much memory, used for A, B, and C.  Which doesn't quite 
meet the needs. (I will be quite happy if this has changed for the 
better since I was thoroughly reviewing such manuals.)

Nits/editorial comments: