Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules-02

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Mon, 23 August 2021 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595653A0914; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 07:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vkoTklDnyU27; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 07:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52C9C3A090B; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 07:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:1815:5480:b768:b865]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 885E1600370; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:51:35 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1629730295; bh=lMQv7KZwFF6BDZQlmkQ4xsAm3WvOX9FxnGNnpAJlMec=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=MgxzzVo5Yax1f1+a692UnWnn7VFMya0nCIMASPxVzg+VLPI96W+o0va/DrxGrxPJh A9YfEt3Los6vhAyoAaA3s3GJeBfRxz1qJiJU/mfksClIxyMAK53zyNOLIJgPPJXaGC LIdxL5+rTeacegOr1Lr6PJiCfLkwmNvuiNLdVukw=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <732D6DEF-F5AD-4D3D-95E5-D41CCA2AECF5@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1FA20386-35DE-44B4-9205-B06AD18E97FF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:51:35 +0300
In-Reply-To: <162673944315.11870.1471796709236350376@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules.all@ietf.org
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
References: <162673944315.11870.1471796709236350376@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 885E1600370.A1178
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/BlNzeueCnNd6yGYKoPJGg7fSQig>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:51:54 -0000

Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.

Lars


> On 2021-7-20, at 3:04, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules-??
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review Date: 2021-07-19
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-08-13
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> This document offers alternate ASN.1 modules that conform to the 2002 version
> of ASN.1 for Evidence Record Syntax (ERS).
> 
> Question:
> Is the Evidence Record Syntax specified in this draft going to obsolete RFC4998?
> 
> How come the AlgorithmIdentifier in this draft is slightly different from the
> AlgorithmIdentifier in RFC4998?
> 
> This draft has:
> 
> AlgorithmIdentifier{}, DIGEST-ALGORITHM
>  FROM AlgorithmInformation-2009 -- in [RFC5912]
>     { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
>       security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
>      id-mod-algorithmInformation-02(58) }
> 
> RFC4998 has:
> AlgorithmIdentifier
>    FROM PKIX1Explicit88
>         { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6)
>            internet(1) security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7)
>            mod(0) pkix1-explicit(18) }
> 
> RFC4998's pkix1-explicit(18) is not present in this draft. Is it intended?
> 
> Best Regards,
> Linda Dunbar
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art