IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Sat, 16 January 2016 03:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABBC1B3679; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:21:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nyhGn0o1rF61; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:21:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 507FE1B3677; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:21:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.201] (ip-64-134-24-180.public.wayport.net [64.134.24.180]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u0G3L98m024927 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Jan 2016 21:21:10 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host ip-64-134-24-180.public.wayport.net [64.134.24.180] claimed to be [192.168.2.201]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-E30AC766-93DE-4B11-9D36-D4EB29C4C54C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13C75)
In-Reply-To: <56997225.9000405@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 21:21:03 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <D3510C4E-A4AD-40B4-9622-BAD702DF6292@nostrum.com>
References: <569820FC.7050309@nostrum.com> <56997225.9000405@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Bn8a7UGfBkg5dRYEW4Qj3l1rgUA>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-codec-oggopus.all@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 03:21:13 -0000

The last call announcement included the following  text:
> Please note that the document makes normative references to RFCs 3533 and 4732, which are informational.
> 
Thanks!

Ben.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 15, 2016, at 4:26 PM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> 
> At the very least, the last call needed to identify the downref to RFC 3533.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email