IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-avtext-rid-06

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 30 August 2016 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137B312D8FE; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Un3OKYVGhzJP; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F7D12D90D; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC5E2CC9B; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 19:00:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBoofpmNUO9t; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 19:00:09 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33C82CC40; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 19:00:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4B8151F4-29AD-49A3-A41A-89111B61A31F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <2B6D740E-660C-4919-9978-E33423B5DB4B@vigilsec.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 19:00:07 +0300
Message-Id: <E7DCDB96-F404-493A-8F23-BDCA54C973FB@piuha.net>
References: <2B6D740E-660C-4919-9978-E33423B5DB4B@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/BoZB4YxyQw2BWOKIwf3Enw3VQuY>
Cc: draft-ietf-avtext-rid.all@ietf.org, IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-avtext-rid-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:19:08 -0000

Russ,

Many thanks for your reviews, including this one. I plan to ballot no-objection for this draft.

Some further comments inline:

> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major Concerns: None
> 
> Minor Concerns:
> 
> I think it would be useful to move the last paragraph in Section 3.3
> into a Privacy Considerations section.  This would also eliminate the
> need for a pointer at the beginning of the Security Considerations.

Did the authors note this potential suggestion? (I’m fine either way.)

I looked at the document and found it to be ok.

Did everyone notice that the two privacy paragraphs from Section 4 were removed? I think they could be removed safely, but just making an observation.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email