Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-04
jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Wed, 15 February 2012 20:34 UTC
Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9A221F865E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:34:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.324
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.324 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.275, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ALVQycAg2dgg for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:33:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC9421F8646 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:33:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lahl5 with SMTP id l5so1678119lah.31 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:33:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=AJj3vauumKWEgmV2RNN0ZW7Ctr8jHNNOIynxFyc01v8=; b=DVCy/yShW2flQevef6bhtFQytcQL8RLzZJBtZpEGc3YlylbcXKb9j2kESAKhzNp4Wy xg889fHK5Eeknh3BALO7ionqT0C0byTGReJ3MKv6s68wnh2qYjhhO7bQX2ulLghf2d/t l4w0eIFVZHNrkLmrDSuMrolKYjbn2beMhLgOU=
Received: by 10.112.54.38 with SMTP id g6mr692207lbp.43.1329338032164; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:33:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a83-245-213-3.elisa-laajakaista.fi (a83-245-213-3.elisa-laajakaista.fi. [83.245.213.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j4sm4482979lbf.6.2012.02.15.12.33.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACvMsLEciyGLDKe5S4iGLNsfXSybKHrkKYixVMi07DW2_aWQbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:33:47 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <D368DD9B-B864-4F26-BA60-8B974633E4F2@gmail.com>
References: <CACvMsLEciyGLDKe5S4iGLNsfXSybKHrkKYixVMi07DW2_aWQbw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pete McCann <mccap@petoni.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:34:00 -0000
Pete, Thanks for the review. Agree that in general having a hole in otherwise continuous prefix is guaranteed to cause always some undesired side effects. Regarding sending RAs I don't this it will be much of an issue, though. Assuming SLAAC is used, then the requesting router would anyway be sending a /64 in each RA on its downstream interfaces, thus chopping the delegated prefix into a number of smaller prefixes. And if each downstream interface have their own /64 prefix, then including a summary prefix shorter than /64 does not really work. - Jouni On Feb 15, 2012, at 9:35 PM, Pete McCann wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd > or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-04 > Reviewer: Peter McCann > Review Date: 2012-02-15 > IETF LC End Date: > IESG Telechat date: 2012-02-16 > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: > > Might want to point out that when the requesting router sends router > advertisements downstream, > it cannot simply advertise the whole delegated prefix but must instead > advertise chunks of it that > do not include the excluded prefix. This may introduce complications > and extra overhead. > > Nits/editorial comments: None
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-d… Pete McCann
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ie… jouni korhonen