IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-06

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 10 August 2018 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684AC130E9F; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1QZrPN0ZW91m; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x233.google.com (mail-pl0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0BF2130E2F; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x233.google.com with SMTP id t17-v6so4467583ply.13; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qwIFY2K1oFUtQeOWdzJsHNcdSmFKRVOHw+BCAQPoC2A=; b=A0h+fmSd+WboTCZklodpcc2+7KHhHIEVq5E3nL7vaBOMZ8Ga1Wtn8Me267L+YfjSiG JpMKERvQUPVfPQROc/VhWlXkeTaz1sM1sUUfpeXwdlG8t4KCKDhuWs1gy81XgGv4/boT VWO9IDDxj9HGWK06DerH1kS1cgcnvtxM6CdIdOJiGhdX17L7iIa4gHTVrAwDeLVMNI6t +66HP0LVnVIYNaWMU7Ns1tbbakmmJGKMCTsV4DsY9zxcReSNK2Ygeb60qT38p01MycL9 8d1wrxD/v4vaZU38t2e1YRPkeXrHePeC7siOfAAcD38DRXZK/1oUCNF4stfI2DKACsIm lK0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qwIFY2K1oFUtQeOWdzJsHNcdSmFKRVOHw+BCAQPoC2A=; b=ojryyk4ybc2qtl0p4MtosLTJVLj0tb+EaXFFAGOP04PfY7fm79PDRsEj7cYxtpvpYl B2R2qb3KcBqknWtsuG8cldGoLeWPP2QtGy8VihLB3+flADI1H2/WgUnqVWmymuKgG/hc ZUgw/Z4MSNeCnYDdmaiwhRTLxuoQryKCUYuzj4xeq9+gRqEvdL6udpgyBklLLQiA491x kEcIqODSkkb1t4HEa83ApDlY37W0LzRJRTTQ5Y0gBK3xMfj0FgEvWMvzlGGbWKle2KZl zzrBpD/BbtfVKwIzNlGDVQQlr6GCf5qhTjVJfC/pyukmfboBB2qFQECINx2F8EWRB77T zEXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlH/i/kkC4mCIFXemg8+bcrb3OBamRFk/VUP3MDgyHSy1Omy7cjB xkLcnJJlqvhejudSuNQNRYDHGaE0
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPyGRP7eFBE+P7JpV/whSDF0YYIkcI7+MXIUgLLNSvPHUDzA2jZI134yEDcACuHYx8Dz+E5Vfg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8e81:: with SMTP id bg1-v6mr7355563plb.129.1533932668196; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (227.24.255.123.static.snap.net.nz. [123.255.24.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q78-v6sm17869229pfi.185.2018.08.10.13.24.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-reference-model.all@ietf.org
References: <153386283991.28744.9091243291268056328@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180810051018.ovgyku7jk4dwvzy2@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <c3a8350c-7b29-e0a3-b6f8-dcf2aa402fa4@joelhalpern.com> <20180810161228.kylkuaq4c3uddfc2@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e389ab5c-1f97-0b7f-1854-0370a6e5e920@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 08:24:35 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180810161228.kylkuaq4c3uddfc2@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/D3ekQjAjxQTnLVaDS_ysrsgZNvY>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 20:24:30 -0000

(CCs trimmed, since I doubt that ietf@ietf.org cares to see the
details...)

Just on a couple of points:

>>> chair hat on:
>>> There can not be a draft covering this yet, because the current
>>> ANIMA charter didn't allow us to do this. We've got individual drafts
>>> lined up for this topic, we just need to get through the rechartering,
>>> we have started the discuss with our AD and wanted to then bring this to
>>> the WG.
>> <jmh>How can this informational documents say "ASA must ..." if there is no
>> definition of what they must do.  If the WG has not addressed this topic,
>> then reword this.  Maybe "It is expected that wide deployment in the future
>> will need ..." </jmh>
> 
> I think 6.1 is just missing the (*).

I hadn't thought of draft-carpenter-anima-asa-guidelines ever
going to the standards track. In any case we'd need a lot more
implementation experience before we could consider that. So IMHO
we should simply wordsmith section 6.2 to avoid any hint of a
normative requirement.

Similarly:

>     Personal opinion: Section 8 on coordination is too hypothetical to be
>     useful to a reader of this document.  I think it is better removed.

It's definitely a future work item, but as a minimum I think we
should state the problem, so I would suggest editing it down
rather than deleting it.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email