Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07.txt
Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> Mon, 05 January 2015 21:31 UTC
Return-Path: <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9D81A8ABB for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:31:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nJ_YG3EA6tsL for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:31:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F8801A8AB9 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:31:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.200] (p508F3A37.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.143.58.55]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFC31C0C0BC8; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 22:31:05 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
In-Reply-To: <201412311408.sBVE8rUt008056@givry.fdupont.fr>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 22:31:03 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <AEED3A1B-F858-4927-AFF4-960392BE260B@fh-muenster.de>
References: <201412311408.sBVE8rUt008056@givry.fdupont.fr>
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/DOLODEtMHu5l_IzRXk9Iw_CivOc
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:31:09 -0000
On 31 Dec 2014, at 15:08, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20141224 > IETF LC End Date: 20141224 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > 5 page 4: in "its lower layer should provide this" > the term "should" is ambiguous, i.e., either it is a keyword > and SHOULD is better, or it is not and a different word should be used. > Note I don't know the authors' intention so the best solution. Hi Francis, thanks for the review. I changed "should" to "have to". Best regards Michael > > Regards > > Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr >
- [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-en… Francis Dupont
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtl… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtl… Jari Arkko