IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-05

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 23 November 2011 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14811F0C35 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:28:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.074, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYB1Tzv1CmqA for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:28:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from morbo.mail.tigertech.net (morbo.mail.tigertech.net [67.131.251.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD1411E80BA for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:28:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net (mailc2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.156]) by morbo.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3883CD1A2 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4589280F07 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:28:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net
Received: from [10.154.180.193] (unknown [129.192.185.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BE3D280F05 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4ECC3E15.5060104@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:28:05 -0500
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gen-art@ietf.org
References: <4EA08F4F.7040403@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EA08F4F.7040403@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:28:33 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other IESG review comments 
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-05
     RPL Option for Carrying RPL Information in Data-Plane Datagrams
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 22-Nov-2011
IETF LC End Date: 31-Oct-2011
IESG Telechat date: 1-Dec-2011

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard 
RFC.

Major issues:
     The major issue from earlier my review has been resolved.

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
     While calling a bit the O bit does not appear unreasonable, I note 
that when looking at the packet form, the difference between the O bit 
and the mbz bits marked as 0 is small, and a likely source of confusion 
for the reader.

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status