IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-grow-no-more-unallocated-slash8s-03.txt

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 05 October 2011 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <lunohod.baikonur@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED5A21F8C19; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y+Q61IatmYpF; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764C821F8C07; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iaby26 with SMTP id y26so2623695iab.31 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OvBtPQ+YCo9ZCrwn+N1nYzj3erGYb/GTNeGyXc2/cio=; b=e0HEdkvf/5+4rdxWXD8UEdIsd9NsCCuul6afnC58tqP0sazvLNcdstRtpQDzbhivs9 lplx/5iGwosIU3OJdOsnU/ChtAC5woT7OMLFQCf4qI90mD/akqRuFnlfLq7LDeK3DYqQ GD9Z4iCNtZvFZAZ8JqEcb+xkHbC8fZOOGRg/g=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.150.132 with SMTP id a4mr4227210icw.73.1317842426853; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: lunohod.baikonur@googlemail.com
Received: by 10.42.247.199 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <41F6C547EA49EC46B4EE1EB2BC2F3418377FFE21B7@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
References: <CADkeqZU5z5488bdnqb3kYH1Yx+PX4LhmbWFjJ9K+=NVHkmEDGw@mail.gmail.com> <41F6C547EA49EC46B4EE1EB2BC2F3418377FFE21B7@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:20:26 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZjR07RLttcFSSurRxF0X0uhh3zM
Message-ID: <CADkeqZUrtF8kPxBOYbFMN651w3+7PSmnTaVRpxEWeDSkQ77Scw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
To: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="90e6ba212373b8fb9004ae92193a"
Cc: "christopher.morrow@gmail.com" <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-grow-no-more-unallocated-slash8s-03.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:17:19 -0000

Hi Leo,

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org> wrote:

> Hi Alexey,****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for reviewing the document. ****
>
> ** **
>
> I suppose I could add back the reference I previously had to RFC 3871 and
> maybe a new one to RFC 1208 to resolve this one. They defined them like
> this:****
>
> ** **
>
>       A "Bogon" (plural: "bogons") is a packet with an IP source address**
> **
>
>       in an address block not yet allocated by IANA or the Regional****
>
>       Internet Registries (ARIN, RIPE, APNIC...) as well as all****
>
>       addresses reserved for private or special use by RFCs.  See****
>
>       [RFC3330] and [RFC1918].****
>
> ** **
>
> Martian: Humorous term applied to packets that turn up unexpectedly****
>
>    on the wrong network because of bogus routing entries.  Also used as***
> *
>
>    a name for a packet which has an altogether bogus (non-registered or***
> *
>
>    ill-formed) Internet address.****
>
> ** **
>
> So, bogons are generally considered a sub-set of Martians, yes.
>

Ok, good.

Yes, I think expanding definitions would improve readability.

Leo****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* lunohod.baikonur@googlemail.com [mailto:
> lunohod.baikonur@googlemail.com] *On Behalf Of *Alexey Melnikov
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 05, 2011 11:26 AM
> *To:* Leo Vegoda
> *Cc:* christopher.morrow@gmail.com; General Area Review Team; The IESG
> *Subject:* Gen-Art review of
> draft-ietf-grow-no-more-unallocated-slash8s-03.txt****
>
> ** **
>
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)****
>
> reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at*
> ***
>
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>****
>
> ** **
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments****
>
> you may receive.****
>
> ** **
>
> Document:  draft-ietf-grow-no-more-unallocated-slash8s-03****
>
> Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov****
>
> Review Date: 2011-10-05****
>
> IETF LC End Date: 2011-10-12****
>
> IESG Telechat date:****
>
> ** **
>
> Summary: The document is ready for publication as a BCP.****
>
> ** **
>
> Nit: I did find the difference between "bogons" and "martians" to be a bit
> confusing: every "bogon" is a "martian", right?****
>
> ** **
>

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status