Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06

Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> Thu, 07 June 2018 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBAC130ED2; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 03:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A6Cd8Ji4Mwqq; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 03:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41EDE130E76; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 03:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.6.67] (unknown [38.64.177.126]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F157721E281A; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:23:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Message-Id: <1AAC22CC-6940-4531-85E3-28DAB08BCF17@fh-muenster.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_85F3010A-53F3-4E26-BAA2-6B19A249FAB4"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 06:23:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <D73EAC2D.30F9A%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata.all@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
References: <9c54eccb-82f2-e135-39af-6bf32824b648@alum.mit.edu> <D73AC219.30C7F%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <D73ADF2B.30D2E%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <7EDB7C11-4263-407B-A320-BCFEA28DFB49@fh-muenster.de> <D73EAC2D.30F9A%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/DhtOSx9uYGwxj-mt7kp6Y7fsGX4>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 10:23:17 -0000

> On 7. Jun 2018, at 02:40, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Please see inline.
> 
>>> On 4. Jun 2018, at 05:17, Christer Holmberg
>>> <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Re-sent due to wrong e-mail address.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I have also looked at this document, and there are things that I have
>>>> think are unclear:
>>>> 
>>>> Q1: It is Informational, and it does not update RFC 4960. Instead, it
>>>> just
>>>> seems to list the erratas (but without even referencing them, as noted
>>>> by
>>>> Paul). I think that it should be made very clear that this document is
>>>> only for guidance, and that implementers shall use the actual erratas
>>>> for
>>>> the actual updates.
>> Please note that the documents covers the following processed erratas and
>> also mentions this:
>> 
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.1
>> covers Errata ID 1440.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.2
>> covers Errata ID 1574.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.3
>> covers Errata ID 2592.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.4
>> covers Errata ID 3291 and Errata ID 3804.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.5
>> covers Errata ID 3423.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.6
>> covers Errata ID 3788.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.7
>> covers Errata ID 4071.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.8
>> covers Errata ID 4400.
>> * 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06#section-3.9
>> covers Errata ID 5003.
> 
> I did not find a reference to Errata ID 5003 for the changes to section
> 10.1. But, you are right that the other erratas are mentioned. I should
> have double checked that.
Hi Christer,

sorry for not be precise. By double checking that the erratas where covered
I figured out that 5003 was not mentioned (one of the typos) and I added
it yesterday:
https://github.com/sctplab/rfc4960bis/commit/b8e4e8c6c558c66dab4530cce1b0b5af8eea9b0f

Sorry for the confusion.

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer