Re: [Gen-art] gen-art "boilerplate" in review tool?

"A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com> Fri, 16 December 2016 22:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mahoney@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB10129424 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:41:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0UT3T7BCqYx5 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5675312949A for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mutabilis-2.local ([47.186.56.40]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uBGMfUEB065662 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 16:41:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mahoney@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.56.40] claimed to be mutabilis-2.local
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
References: <6ef22a66-64f9-b07e-5fac-14f9e2647400@si6networks.com> <f6aebfff-09c1-1b6c-ea63-70d683a83f1b@si6networks.com>
From: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <5ed2abf6-89c3-18e0-4de4-003949c5f192@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 16:41:30 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f6aebfff-09c1-1b6c-ea63-70d683a83f1b@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/DwmJIclyT6F3ytD-dxEpOE-yBrg>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] gen-art "boilerplate" in review tool?
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 22:41:33 -0000

Hi Fernando,

There's a ticket open for adding the template:

https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/ticket/2075

As for the preview, everything that's provided in the "Review Content" 
field goes into the body of the message. Datatracker doesn't add 
anything to it. When the template is added, it will be displayed in the 
"Review Content" field.

Thanks!

Jean


On 12/16/16 3:54 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm almost sure I saw a discussion of this somewhere, but... anyway:
> would it be possible to have the review tool automatically insert the
> gen-art "boiler-plate"?  Besides, would it be possible to preview what's
> going to be sent by email (and e.g., allow for confirmation)?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> Fernando
>
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review of
> draft-holmberg-dispatch-mcptt-rp-namespace-03
> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:48:59 -0300
> From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> CC: ietf@ietf.org, draft-holmberg-dispatch-mcptt-rp-namespace.all@ietf.org
>
> Folks,
>
> Apologies: wasn't sure whether the tool would insert the "boilerplate",
> so... here it is:
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any
> other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Here's my review:
>
>
> On 12/16/2016 06:46 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
>> Reviewer: Fernando Gont
>> Review result: Ready with Nits
>>
>> ** Technical **
>>
>> * Section 3, pages 3-4:
>>>    Intended algorithm for mcpttq is queuing.
>>>
>>>    New Warning cde: No.
>>>
>>>    New SIP response code: No.
>>
>> Is this kind of thing really needed/required in the registry?
>>
>>
>>
>> ** Editorial **
>>
>> * Section 1, page 2:
>>>    The third generation partnership project (3GPP)
>>
>> May be you should capitalize these? (i.e., "Third Generation...")
>>
>>
>> * Section 1, page 2:
>>> In addition to this a commercial PTT
>>>    service for non-professional use (e.g., groups of people on
>> holiday)
>>
>> Please insert a comma after "this".
>>
>>
>> * Section 1, page 3:
>>> MCPTT data transfer currently under development can
>>>    benefit from a queueing mechanism.
>>
>> "data transfer..." protocols?
>>
>>
>> * Section 2, page 3:
>>> The use of this namespace outside such network is
>>>    undefined.
>>
>> s/network/networks/
>>
>>
>> * Section 5, page 5:
>>> 5.  IANA Considerations
>>>
>>>    Abiding by the rules established within [RFC4412] and [RFC7134],
>> this
>>>    is an Informative RFC registering two new namespaces, their
>>>    associated priority-values, and intended algorithms.
>>
>> s/registering/creating/ ?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gen-art mailing list
>> Gen-art@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>>
>
>